Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37584706›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2023

Evaluation of neurotoxicity and the role of oxidative stress of cobalt nanoparticles, titanium dioxide nanoparticles, and multiwall carbon nanotubes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Cheng Chen, Jingrong Chen, Xinpei Lin, Jiafu Yang, Huimin Qu, Lisong Li, Duanyan Zhang, Wei Wang, Xiangyu Chang, Zhenkun Guo and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Cheng ChenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Jingrong ChenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Xinpei LinDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Jiafu YangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Huimin QuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Lisong LiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Duanyan ZhangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Wei WangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Xiangyu ChangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Zhenkun GuoFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Ping CaiFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Guangxia YuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Wenya ShaoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Hong HuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Siying WuFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Huangyuan LiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.
Julia BornhorstFood Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany.
Michael AschnerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.
Fuli ZhengDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province 350122, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3349-0862
Fujian Medical University · CNAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversity of Wuppertal · DE

Funding

Mechanisms of Manganese NeurotoxicityR01ES010563 · NIEHS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Michael Aschner, Aaron B Bowman · 2001 to 2026
$11.9M
Mechanisms of Methylmercury Induced Neuron ToxicityR01ES007331 · NIEHS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Michael Aschner, Aaron B Bowman · 1996 to 2026
$10.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES010563NIH HHS R01ES07331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread use of nanomaterials in daily life has led to increased concern about their potential neurotoxicity. Therefore, it is particularly important to establish a simple and reproducible assessment system. Representative nanomaterials, including cobalt nanoparticles (CoNPs), titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs), and multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), were compared in terms of their neurotoxicity and underlying mechanisms. In 0, 25, 50, and 75 μg/ml of these nanomaterials, the survival, locomotion behaviors, acetylcholinesterase (AchE) activity, reactive oxygen species production, and glutathione-S transferase 4 (Gst-4) activation in wildtype and transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) were evaluated. All nanomaterials induced an imbalance in oxidative stress, decreased the ratio of survival, impaired locomotion behaviors, as well as reduced the activity of AchE in C. elegans. Interestingly, CoNPs and MWCNTs activated Gst-4, but not TiO2-NPs. The reactive oxygen species scavenger, N-acetyl-l-cysteine, alleviated oxidative stress and Gst-4 upregulation upon exposure to CoNPs and MWCNTs, and rescued the locomotion behaviors. MWCNTs caused the most severe damage, followed by CoNPs and TiO2-NPs. Furthermore, oxidative stress and subsequent activation of Gst-4 were involved in nanomaterials-induced neurotoxicity. Our study provides a comprehensive comparison of the neurotoxicity and mechanisms of typical nanomaterials, which could serve as a model for hazard assessment of environmental pollutants using C. elegans as an experimental model system.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesNanotubes, CarbonAcetylcholinesteraseAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCobaltOxidative StressReactive Oxygen SpeciesTitaniumAcetylcholinesteraseCobaltNanotubes, CarbonReactive Oxygen SpeciesTitaniumtitanium dioxidecobalt nanoparticlesmultiwall carbon nanotubesnanomaterialsneurotoxicityoxidative stresstitanium dioxide nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID37584706
PMCPMC10614054
OpenAlexW4385851407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.