Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37584683›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2023

Aortic valve repair in neonates, infants and children: a systematic review, meta-analysis and microsimulation study.

Maximiliaan L Notenboom, Reda Rhellab, Jonathan R G Etnel, Nova van den Bogerd, Kevin M Veen, Yannick J H J Taverne, Willem A Helbing, Pieter C van de Woestijne, Ad J J C Bogers, Johanna J M Takkenberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long-term surgical outcomes of congenital supravalvular aortic stenosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis and microsimulation study.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical course of severe congenital aortic valve stenosis in children.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Ross Procedure in Children with Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maximiliaan L NotenboomDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3828-6775
Reda RhellabDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jonathan R G EtnelDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3960-8035
Nova van den BogerdDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Kevin M VeenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2806-8384
Yannick J H J TaverneDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9553-5814
Willem A HelbingDepartment of Paediatrics, Div. of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1023-1537
Pieter C van de WoestijneDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0826-7837
Ad J J C BogersDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6200-1998
Johanna J M TakkenbergDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9809-5623
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo support clinical decision-making in children with aortic valve disease, by compiling the available evidence on outcome after paediatric aortic valve repair (AVr).

methodsA systematic review of literature reporting clinical outcome after paediatric AVr (mean age at surgery <18 years) published between 1 January 1990 and 23 December 2021 was conducted. Early event risks, late event rates and time-to-event data were pooled. A microsimulation model was employed to simulate the lives of individual children, infants and neonates following AVr.

resultsForty-one publications were included, encompassing 2 623 patients with 17 217 patient-years of follow-up (median follow-up: 7.3 years; range: 1.0-14.4 years). Pooled mean age during repair for aortic stenosis in children (<18 years), infants (<1 year) or neonates (<30 days) was 5.2 ± 3.9 years, 35 ± 137 days and 11 ± 6 days, respectively. Pooled early mortality after stenosis repair in children, infants and neonates, respectively, was 3.5% (95% confidence interval: 1.9-6.5%), 7.4% (4.2-13.0%) and 10.7% (6.8-16.9%). Pooled late reintervention rate after stenosis repair in children, infants and neonates, respectively, was 3.31%/year (1.66-6.63%/year), 6.84%/year (3.95-11.83%/year) and 6.32%/year (3.04-13.15%/year); endocarditis 0.07%/year (0.03-0.21%/year), 0.23%/year (0.07-0.71%/year) and 0.49%/year (0.18-1.29%/year); and valve thrombosis 0.05%/year (0.01-0.26%/year), 0.15%/year (0.04-0.53%/year) and 0.19%/year (0.05-0.77%/year). Microsimulation-based mean life expectancy in the first 20 years for children, infants and neonates with aortic stenosis, respectively, was 18.4 years (95% credible interval: 18.1-18.7 years; relative survival compared to the matched general population: 92.2%), 16.8 years (16.5-17.0 years; relative survival: 84.2%) and 15.9 years (14.8-17.0 years; relative survival: 80.1%). Microsimulation-based 20-year risk of reintervention in children, infants and neonates, respectively, was 75.2% (72.9-77.2%), 53.8% (51.9-55.7%) and 50.8% (47.0-57.6%).

conclusionsLong-term outcomes after paediatric AVr for stenosis are satisfactory and dependent on age at surgery. Despite a high hazard of reintervention for valve dysfunction and slightly impaired survival relative to the general population, AVr is associated with low valve-related event occurrences and should be considered in children with aortic valve disease.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationAdolescentAortic ValveChildConstriction, PathologicHumansInfantInfant, NewbornReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAortic valve diseaseMicrosimulationPaediatricsValve repairValve sparing

Identifiers

PMID37584683
PMCPMC10502195
OpenAlexW4385851106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.