Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37584638›Full record

SynthesisThe veterinary quarterly2023

Seroprevalence and risk factors of brucellosis in dromedary camels (

Abdullah Mohammed, Musa Ahmed, Ahmed Osman Ahmed, Sadam Yousof, Suad Hamad, Yassir Shuaib, Nasir Ibrahim

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The veterinary quarterly, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The global seroprevalence ofThe veterinary quarterly · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Seroprevalence and molecular detection ofInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Abdullah MohammedDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Gadarif, Gadarif, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0003-2534-4953
Musa AhmedReproductive Health Sciences Program, Pan African University Life and Earth Sciences Institute (PAULESI), University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-0224-9718
Ahmed Osman AhmedDepartment of Microbiology, Pathology, and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Gadarif, Gadarif, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0001-9492-2089
Sadam YousofDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Gadarif, Gadarif, Sudan.
Suad HamadDepartment of Zoonotic Disease and Disease Control, Ministry of Animal Resources, Al-Hamadi, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0003-2250-8721
Yassir ShuaibCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum North, Sudan.
Nasir IbrahimDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6382-8807
Gadarif University · SDUniversity of Ibadan · NGChina Animal Disease Control Center · CNImam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University · SASudan University of Science and Technology · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Camel brucellosis is a major public health concern in Sudan; however, there is no overall estimation of the prevalence of camel brucellosis in Sudan. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this study aimed to perform a meta-analysis of 30 eligible studies published before December 31, 2022, with a total of 70059 dromedary camels, to estimate the pooled prevalence of camel brucellosis and its risk factors in Sudan. The random effect model was used for the final analysis due to the significantly high heterogeneity among the included studies, and the results showed that the overall pooled prevalence of camel brucellosis was 17%, with a confidence interval (CI) of 12%-21%. The prevalence was higher in males than females (54% vs. 46%) and in adults than youngling (77% vs. 23%). The prevalence also varied by region, with central and northern Sudan having the highest prevalence (24%), compared to other regions of Sudan. Moreover, the prevalence of camel brucellosis appeared to be decreasing over time. The current study concluded that camel brucellosis infection is still endemic in many areas of Sudan, with the disease being especially prevalent in central and northern Sudan. Thus, this study provides valuable information for the prevention and control of camel brucellosis in Sudan. However, the significant heterogeneity among the included studies should be taken into account when interpreting these results. Finally, to provide adequate information, research must be updated, and more research must be conducted in many regions of Sudan.

Indexed as

BrucellosisCamelusAnimalsFemaleMaleRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSudanBrucellosisdromedary camelmeta-analysisrisk factorsseroprevalenceSudan

Identifiers

PMID37584638
PMCPMC10472849
OpenAlexW4385851429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.