Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37584483›Full record

ArticleOperative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)2023

Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Localization Variability Comparing Intraoperative MRI Versus Postoperative Computed Tomography.

Alexander G Yearley, Melissa Chua, Andreas Horn, G Rees Cosgrove, John D Rolston

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander G YearleyHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Melissa ChuaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andreas HornDepartment of Neurology, Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
G Rees CosgroveDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
John D RolstonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Patient-Specific Modeling and Network Perturbation to Enhance the Predictability of Direct Cortical Stimulation for EpilepsyK23NS114178 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ROLSTON, JOHN D · 2019 to 2023
$961k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS114178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCommercially available lead localization software for deep brain stimulation (DBS) often relies on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans to define electrode positions. When cases are performed with intraoperative MRI, another imaging set exists with which to perform these localizations. To compare DBS localization error between postoperative CT scans and intraoperative MRI.

methodsA retrospective cohort of patients who underwent MRI-guided placement of DBS electrodes using the ClearPoint platform was identified. Using Brainlab Elements, postoperative CT scans were coregistered to intraoperative magnetic resonance images visualizing the ClearPoint guidance sheaths and ceramic stylets. DBS electrodes were identified in CT scans using Brainlab's lead localization tool. Trajectory and vector errors were quantified between scans for each lead in each patient.

resultsEighty patients with a total of 157 implanted DBS electrodes were included. We observed mean trajectory and vector errors of 0.78 ± 0.44 mm (range 0.1-2.0 mm) and 1.57 ± 0.79 mm (range 0.2-4.2 mm), respectively, between postoperative CT and intraoperative MRI. There were 7 patients with CT scans collected at multiple time points. Trajectory error increased by 0.15 ± 0.42 mm ( P = .31), and vector error increased by 0.22 ± 0.53 mm ( P = .13) in the later scans. Across all scans, there was no significant association between trajectory ( P = .053) or vector ( P = .98) error and the date of CT acquisition. DBS electrodes targeting the subthalamic nucleus had significantly greater trajectory errors ( P = .02) than those targeting the globus pallidus pars internus nucleus.

conclusionCommercially available software produced largely concordant lead localizations when comparing intraoperative MRIs with postoperative CT scans, with trajectory errors on average <1 mm. CT scans tend to be more comparable with intraoperative MRI in the immediate postoperative period, with increased time intervals associated with a greater magnitude of error between modalities.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37584483
PMCPMC12245324
OpenAlexW4385851266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.