Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37584405›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative effectiveness research2023

Access in all areas? A round up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 1.

Ramiro Gilardino, Catrin Treharne, Silvy Mardiguian, Sreeram V Ramagopalan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ramiro GilardinoMSD Innovation & Development, Zurich, 8058, Switzerland.
Catrin TreharneLane Clark & Peacock, London, W1U 1DQ, UK.
Silvy MardiguianBeiGene, London, EC4A 4AB, UK.
Sreeram V RamagopalanLane Clark & Peacock, London, W1U 1DQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this new series reviewing recent developments in market access, we highlight publications investigating health technology assessment (HTA) guidance, review processes and outcomes across the world and discuss how forthcoming changes in the HTA and regulatory environment in the European Union may allow for more consistency in decision making.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalEuropean UnionHumansdecision makingEuropean Unionhealth technology assessmentjoint clinical assessmentmarket accessregulatory

Identifiers

PMID37584405
PMCPMC10690433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.