ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2023
Comparison of multiple international metrics for benchmarking antibiotic usage (ABU) using UK beef and sheep data.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A mixed method approach to analysing patterns and drivers of antibiotic use and resistance in beef farms in Argentina.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate surveillance of livestock antibiotic usage (ABU) at the farm level is an increasingly important part of national antibiotic stewardship initiatives. Numerous ABU indicators or metrics have been developed in Europe and North America but the comparability of these metrics is poorly understood. For policymakers, understanding the relationship between metrics is important when considering the risks posed by ABU and how to regulate them, at the national level, and regulate international trade access in livestock products between countries who use different ABU metrics.
objectivesTo quantify the patterns of ABU among beef (cattle) and lamb (sheep) production systems. To explore ABU variation between farm types across seven ABU metrics developed in Europe and North America using a common dataset of sheep and beef farms' antibiotic purchases from the UK.
methodsA dataset of >16 200 antibiotic sales events to 686 farm enterprises of different types underwent quantitative analysis. Correlation matrixes were generated for seven international ABU metrics.
resultsABU was significantly higher among calf-rearers. Across all farm types, tetracyclines and β-lactams were the predominant groups by mass, but represent a similar dose equivalent to macrolides across most farm types. Good agreement (>0.9) was observed between metrics.
conclusionsReliable metrics to accurately benchmark farms are crucial for maintaining confidence of farmers in the fairness of any surveillance system, especially when the ranking of any given system may be linked to financial subsidies or penalties and also when negotiating import and export access for livestock products between countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.