ArticleTurkish archives of otorhinolaryngology2023
Total Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Cholesteatoma.
Article in Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of Life Outcomes After Endoscopic Cholesteatoma Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Health-related quality of life in patients after endoscopic or microscopic cholesteatoma surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of Endoscopic and Microscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Acquired Cholesteatoma by EAONO/JOS Staging.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of total transcanal endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery. Methods: Twenty-seven cholesteatoma patients that had undergone transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) were included in the study. Age, sex, operation date of patients, operated side, need for ossiculoplasty, graft material, and surgical technique were recorded. All patients were evaluated through otoscopic, endoscopic, and audiological examinations and followed up for at least five months after surgery. All patients were staged using the European Academy of Otology and Neurotology/Japan Otological Society (EAONO/JOS) Staging System on Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. Results: Mean age of the patients was 36.4 years (range, 4-67 years). According to the EAONO/JOS Staging System, 11 patients were stage 1, while 11 were stage 2, and five were stage 3. Two had lateral semicircular canal defect, one had facial canal dehiscence, and one had oval window defect. The average follow-up period was 19 months (range, 5-41 months), during which two patients experienced retraction pocket and hearing loss and one patient had perforation. One patient underwent revision surgery during follow-up and no recurrence or residual cholesteatoma was observed. The preoperative and postoperative air-bone gaps were 25.14±13.93 dB and 22.22±12.64 dB with no significant difference. Conclusion: TEES is a minimally invasive and safe procedure with low complication and recurrence rates. As with all surgical procedures, experience is essential, and as experience increases, the capability to perform endoscopic otologic surgery on more complex cases may become possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.