ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2023
Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for difenoconazole in wheat and rye.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microchemical Techniques for Multiclass Fungicide Residue Analysis in Complex Food Matrices.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Setting of import tolerances for difenoconazole in various crops.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Review of the existing maximum residue levels for difenoconazole according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 55th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for difenoconazole in wheat and rye.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the applicant Syngenta Crop Protection AG submitted an application to the competent national authority in Germany (evaluating Member State, EMS) to modify the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for the active substance difenoconazole in wheat and rye grain. The data submitted in support of the request were found sufficient to derive MRL proposals for wheat and rye grain. Adequate analytical methods for enforcement are available to control the residues of difenoconazole in plant matrices under consideration at the validated limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.01 mg/kg. The submitted data indicate no need to modify the EU MRLs in animal commodities for the existing enforcement residue definition. EFSA concluded that the dietary exposure to difenoconazole residues from the intake of wheat and rye grain is low, noting that the impact of intended uses on the residues in animal commodities and the consumer exposure could not be properly addressed. Overall, the present risk assessment confirms a very narrow margin of safety for the overall chronic exposure and is considered provisional, pending the submission of confirmatory data on possible preferential metabolism/degradation of the four stereo isomers of difenoconazole in plants and animals and the impact of isomerisation on the toxicity of difenoconazole. The assessment is also affected by uncertainties related to the toxicological profile of animal metabolite CGA205375 and, additionally, it does not take into consideration triazole derivative metabolites (TDMs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.