Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583920›Full record

ArticleHong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao2023

Effects and safety of hypertonic saline combined with airway clearance in non-hospitalized children with recurrent wheezing.

Vanesa González-Bellido, Verónica Veláz-Baza, Noelia Rama-Suárez, Carmen Jimeno-Esteo, Josep Sirvent-Gomez, Juan Nicolás Cuenca-Zaldívar, Sari Mayorales-Lises, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes Donadio, Samuel Fernández-Carnero

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04331496 (Saline Serum Versus Hypertonic Serum With Respiratory Physiotherapy in a Recurrent Wheezing Patient), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04331496 naunknown statusnot on this map

Saline Serum Versus Hypertonic Serum With Respiratory Physiotherapy in a Recurrent Wheezing Patient: a Multicenter Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuadarrama HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsBronchiolitisArmsHypertonic solution, Physiological solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vanesa González-BellidoFisiobronquial Physiotherapy Clinic, Madrid, Spain.
Verónica Veláz-BazaFisiobronquial Physiotherapy Clinic, Madrid, Spain.
Noelia Rama-SuárezFisiobronquial Physiotherapy Clinic, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen Jimeno-EsteoFisiobronquial Physiotherapy Clinic, A Coruña, Spain.
Josep Sirvent-GomezHospital Materno Infantil Teresa Herrera, A Coruña, Spain.
Juan Nicolás Cuenca-ZaldívarUniversidad de Alcalá, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Grupo de Investigación en Fisioterapia y Dolor, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Sari Mayorales-LisesManaging Director Hospital Quirónsalud San José, Madrid, Spain.
Márcio Vinícius Fagundes DonadioLaboratory of Pediatric Physical Activity, Centro Infant Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Samuel Fernández-CarneroUniversidad de Alcalá, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Grupo de Investigación en Fisioterapia y Dolor, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Universidad de Alcalá · ESHospital Materno-Infantil · ESUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The International Study of Wheezing in Infants defines recurrent wheezing as the presence of three or more medically documented episodes of wheezing within one year. To date, there is no evidence on the use of hypertonic saline (HS) combined with airway clearance techniques (ACT) for children with recurrent wheezing treated in an outpatient setting. Therefore, this is the first study to explore the use of such interventions in infants with recurrent wheezing. Objectives: To evaluate the effects and safety of a three-month protocol including HS and ACT for non-hospitalized infants with recurrent wheezing. Methods: Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, including outpatient infants with recurrent wheezing. Children were randomized to either 3% HS or 0.9% saline groups and were treated with bronchodilator and nebulized with the respective solutions before ACT. The primary outcome was the Wang score. Secondary outcomes included the number of hospitalizations and respiratory crisis, need for rescue medication, and school absences. All variables were measured during the three previous months from inclusion and during intervention period. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04331496) on March, 31, 2020. Results: Forty children were included. Regarding immediate effects, significant differences ( Conclusion: A three-month protocol including HS and ACT for outpatient infants with recurrent wheezing was safe and reduced morbidity. No differences were found between the use of HS and 0.9% saline.

Indexed as

airway clearancehypertonic salineprolonged slow expirationRecurrent wheezing

Identifiers

PMID37583920
PMCPMC10423675
OpenAlexW4365815134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.