Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583910›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Effects of passages through an insect or a plant on virulence and physiological properties of the fungus

Oksana G Tomilova, Vadim Y Kryukov, Natalia A Kryukova, Khristina P Tolokonnikova, Yuri S Tokarev, Arina S Rumiantseva, Alexander A Alekseev, Viktor V Glupov

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi: The next frontier in mycological biocontrol.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The FungusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oksana G TomilovaInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Vadim Y KryukovInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9762-903X
Natalia A KryukovaInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Khristina P TolokonnikovaInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Yuri S TokarevAll-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Arina S RumiantsevaAll-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander A AlekseevInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Viktor V GlupovInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals · RUAll-Russian Institute of Plant Protection · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species of the genus

Indexed as

MetarhiziumMothsAnimalsInsectaPlantsVirulenceAntagonistic activityColonizationDestruxinLipolytic activityProteolytic activityTomatoWax moth

Identifiers

PMID37583910
PMCPMC10424674
OpenAlexW4385767307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.