Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583887›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Pilot implementation of community health advocacy teams to improve the effectiveness of long-lasting insecticide net distribution through both campaigns and continuous channels in Ghana: a qualitative study of opportunities and barriers to implementation.

Phyllis Dako-Gyeke, Ruby Hornuvo, Franklin N Glozah, Emmanuel Asampong, Philip Teg-Nefaah Tabong, Adanna Nwameme, Gloria M Chandi, Nana Yaw Peprah, David Gittelman, Philip B Adongo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Phyllis Dako-GyekeDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Ruby HornuvoDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Franklin N GlozahDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Emmanuel AsampongDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Philip Teg-Nefaah TabongDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Adanna NwamemeDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Gloria M ChandiGhana Health Service, Ga North Municipal Health Directorate, Accra, Ghana.
Nana Yaw PeprahNational Malaria Elimination Programme, Accra, Ghana.
David GittelmanHealth Campaign Effectiveness Coalition, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, United States.
Philip B AdongoDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In Ghana, the National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP) distributes long-lasting insecticide net (LLIN) to households for free through the periodic point mass distribution (PMD) campaign and continuous distribution to populations most vulnerable to malaria. It is known that the existence of effective and functional community-based groups could influence positive behaviours regarding health interventions promoted through health campaigns. However, there is no evidence of functional community-based groups that aim to improve the effectiveness of LLIN distribution campaigns by transitioning into primary healthcare delivery. This study aimed to explore the opportunities and barriers to the pilot implementation of co-created community health advocacy teams (CHATs) to improve the effectiveness of LLIN distribution through both campaigns and continuous channels in Ghana. Methods: A qualitative research approach was used among 43 CHAT members across six communities in the Eastern and Volta regions of Ghana. The CHAT constitutes significant community actors whose roles are centred on key elements of community/social mobilisation and capacity building, all nested in social and behaviour change communication (SBCC) strategies. The CHATs were pilot implemented in all study communities for 4 months after which we identified opportunities and barriers during implementation. CHAT members participated in six focus group discussions which were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically using the NVivo 13. Results: CHATs were instrumental in sensitising community members through SBCC strategies. Moreover, there were changes in the behaviour of community members who were receptive towards and participated in CHAT activities. Community members were accurately informed about malaria (e.g., causes and preventive measures). However, the CHAT experienced barriers during implementation, including a lack of financial support to aid in transportation, organisation of meetings, and outreach activities. Additionally, the level of participation by CHAT members in activities and the medium of communication among members were key areas of concern. Conclusion: The CHATs would be instrumental in promoting LLINs' use during and after PMD campaigns through community outreaches. It is therefore necessary to provide resources to support their operations and a good network to address communication barriers. Finally, continuous capacity strengthening of CHAT members by the NMCP is important.

Indexed as

InsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaGhanaHumansPublic HealthQualitative ResearchInsecticidescommunity health advocacy teamGhanaimplementation researchinterventionlong-lasting insecticide netmalaria

Identifiers

PMID37583887
PMCPMC10423875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.