Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583852›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2023

Exhaled volatile organic compounds for diagnosis and monitoring of asthma.

Luisa Savito, Simone Scarlata, Andras Bikov, Pierluigi Carratù, Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano, Silvano Dragonieri

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Risk Factors and Mechanisms Leading to Preschool Recurrent Wheeze and Asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luisa SavitoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Pathophysiology and Thoracic Endoscopy, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Rome 00128, Italy.
Simone ScarlataDepartment of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Pathophysiology and Thoracic Endoscopy, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico, Rome 00128, Italy.
Andras BikovWythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom.
Pierluigi CarratùDepartment of Internal Medicine "A.Murri", University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari 70124, Italy.
Giovanna Elisiana CarpagnanoDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy.
Silvano DragonieriDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy. silvano.dragonieri@uniba.it.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITCampus Bio Medico University Hospital · ITManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The asthmatic inflammatory process results in the generation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are subsequently secreted by the airways. The study of these elements through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which can identify individual molecules with a discriminatory capacity of over 85%, and electronic-Nose (e-NOSE), which is able to perform a quick onboard pattern-recognition analysis of VOCs, has allowed new prospects for non-invasive analysis of the disease in an "omics" approach. In this review, we aim to collect and compare the progress made in VOCs analysis using the two methods and their instrumental characteristics. Studies have described the potential of GC-MS and e-NOSE in a multitude of relevant aspects of the disease in both children and adults, as well as differential diagnosis between asthma and other conditions such as wheezing, cystic fibrosis, COPD, allergic rhinitis and last but not least, the accuracy of these methods compared to other diagnostic tools such as lung function, FeNO and eosinophil count. Due to significant limitations of both methods, it is still necessary to improve and standardize techniques. Currently, e-NOSE appears to be the most promising aid in clinical practice, whereas GC-MS, as the gold standard for the structural analysis of molecules, remains an essential tool in terms of research for further studies on the pathophysiologic pathways of the asthmatic inflammatory process. In conclusion, the study of VOCs through GC-MS and e-NOSE appears to hold promise for the non-invasive diagnosis, assessment, and monitoring of asthma, as well as for further research studies on the disease.

Indexed as

AsthmaBreathomicsElectronic-NoseGas chromatography-mass spectrometryNon-invasive diagnosisVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID37583852
PMCPMC10424019
OpenAlexW4385238203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.