Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583588›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Dilemmas concerning heart procurement in controlled donation after circulatory death.

S E Kaffka Genaamd Dengler, M T Vervoorn, M Brouwer, J de Jonge, N P van der Kaaij

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Patient perspectives on the ethics and acceptability of perfusion techniques for organ transplantation: a qualitative study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S E Kaffka Genaamd DenglerDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
M T VervoornDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
M BrouwerDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
J de JongeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
N P van der KaaijDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC Transplant Institute

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an expanding population at risk for heart failure and the resulting increase in patients admitted to the waiting list for heart transplantation, the demand of viable organs exceeds the supply of suitable donor hearts. Use of hearts after circulatory death has reduced this deficit. Two primary techniques for heart procurement in circulatory death donors have been described: direct procurement and perfusion and thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion. While the former has been accepted as an option for heart procurement in circulatory death donors, the latter technique has raised some ethical questions in relation to the dead donor rule. In this paper we discuss the current dilemmas regarding these heart procurement protocols in circulatory death donors.

Indexed as

controlled donation after circulatory death heart transplantationdetermination of deathethicsex-situ heart perfusionthoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion

Identifiers

PMID37583588
PMCPMC10424927
OpenAlexW4385411038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.