ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research Progress of Peach Bacterial Spot Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Novel bioactive compounds from marine-derived endosymbiotic Penicillium fungi reported during 2020-2025.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2026Review
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis suppresses tomato bacterial wilt by coordinating plant systemic resistance with microbiome antagonism.Mycorrhiza · 2026Article
- Current Approaches and Implications in Discovery of Novel Bioactive Products from Microbial Sources.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Biological control of tomato bacterial wilt and apple fire blight through the induced resistance of azomycin derived fromFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Study of marine microorganism metabolites: new resources for bioactive natural products.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bacterial plant diseases cause tremendous economic losses worldwide. However, a few effective and sustainable control methods are currently available. To discover novel and effective management approaches, we screened marine fungi for their antibacterial activity against phytopathogenic bacteria Methods: We screened the culture broth of 55 fungal strains isolated from various marine sources (seawater, algae, and sediment) for their Results and discussion: The culture broth of UL-Ce9 showed high antibacterial activity against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.