Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583516›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Wilder than intense: higher frequency, variability, and viral flows of porcine circovirus 3 in wild boars and rural farms compared to intensive ones in northern Italy.

Giovanni Franzo, Giulia Faustini, Matteo Legnardi, Giacomo Berto, Mariangela Dal Maso, Viviana Genna, Maria Luisa Menandro, Francesca Poletto, Mattia Cecchinato, Michele Drigo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni FranzoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Giulia FaustiniDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Matteo LegnardiDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Giacomo BertoAULSS 8 Berica, Dip di Prevenzione, Servizi Veterinari, Vicenza, Italy.
Mariangela Dal MasoAULSS 8 Berica, Dip di Prevenzione, Servizi Veterinari, Vicenza, Italy.
Viviana GennaAzienda Ulss 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy.
Maria Luisa MenandroDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Francesca PolettoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Mattia CecchinatoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Michele DrigoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Claudia Maria TucciaroneDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · ITAzienda ULSS 9 TREVISO · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Porcine circovirus 3 (PCV-3) was firstly reported in 2017. Although evidence of its pathogenic role has been provided, its clinical relevance seems lower than Porcine circovirus 2 (PCV-2), as well as its evolutionary rate. Different studies have reported a high PCV-3 prevalence in wild boars, sometimes higher than the one observed in commercial pigs. Nevertheless, to date, few studies have objectively investigated the relationships between these populations when inhabiting the same area. Moreover, the role of small-scale, backyard pig production in PCV-3 epidemiology is still obscure. Methods: The present study investigated PCV-3 occurrence in 216 samples collected from the same area of Northern Italy from commercial and rural pigs, and wild boars. PCV-3 presence was tested by qPCR and complete genome or ORF2 sequences were obtained when possible and analysed using a combination of statistical, phylogenetic and phylodynamic approaches. Results: A higher infection risk in wild boars and rural pigs compared to the commercial ones was demonstrated. The phylodynamic analysis confirmed a larger viral population size in wild and rural populations and estimated a preferential viral flow from these populations to commercial pigs. A significant flow from wild to rural animals was also proven. The analysis of the Italian sequences and the comparison with a broader international reference dataset highlighted the circulation of a highly divergent clade in Italian rural pigs and wild boars only. Discussion: Overall, the present study results demonstrate the role of non-commercial pig populations in PCV-3 maintenance, epidemiology and evolution, which could represent a threat to intensive farming.

Indexed as

molecular epidemiologyPCV-3phylogeneticsrural pigviruswild boar

Identifiers

PMID37583516
PMCPMC10425237
OpenAlexW4385409551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.