Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583486›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2023

Estimating body weight and body condition score of mature beef cows using depth images.

Yijie Xiong, Isabella C F S Condotta, Jacki A Musgrave, Tami M Brown-Brandl, J Travis Mulliniks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Advances in Vision-Based Beef Cattle Body Measurement Technologies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Computer vision algorithms to help decision-making in cattle production.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yijie XiongDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-7448
Isabella C F S CondottaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Jacki A MusgraveWest Central Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, NE 69101, USA.
Tami M Brown-BrandlDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-8035
J Travis MulliniksDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2963-523X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obtaining accurate body weight (BW) is crucial for management decisions yet can be a challenge for cow-calf producers. Fast-evolving technologies such as depth sensing have been identified as low-cost sensors for agricultural applications but have not been widely validated for U.S. beef cattle. This study aimed to (1) estimate the body volume of mature beef cows from depth images, (2) quantify BW and metabolic weight (MBW) from image-projected body volume, and (3) classify body condition scores (BCS) from image-obtained measurements using a machine-learning-based approach. Fifty-eight crossbred cows with a mean BW of 410.0 ± 60.3 kg and were between 4 and 6 yr of age were used for data collection between May and December 2021. A low-cost, commercially available depth sensor was used to collect top-view depth images. Images were processed to obtain cattle biometric measurements, including MBW, body length, average height, maximum body width, dorsal area, and projected body volume. The dataset was partitioned into training and testing datasets using an 80%:20% ratio. Using the training dataset, linear regression models were developed between image-projected body volume and BW measurements. Results were used to test BW predictions for the testing dataset. A machine-learning-based multivariate analysis was performed with 29 algorithms from eight classifiers to classify BCS using multiple inputs conveniently obtained from the cows and the depth images. A feature selection algorithm was performed to rank the relevance of each input to the BCS. Results demonstrated a strong positive correlation between the image-projected cow body volume and the measured BW (

Indexed as

body weightcow–calfimage processingmachine-learningprecision livestock management, rangeland

Identifiers

PMID37583486
PMCPMC10424719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.