ArticleTranslational animal science2023
Estimating body weight and body condition score of mature beef cows using depth images.
Article in Translational animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Vision-Based Beef Cattle Body Measurement Technologies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- The CIDR-GPG Protocol Improves Reproductive Efficiency in Yaks and Lowers the Body Condition Requirements for Success.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Early prediction of final body weight in Hanwoo steers using machine and deep learning models.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Real-Time Beef Cattle Body Condition Scoring Using EdgeBCS-YOLO: A Lightweight Framework for Edge Deployment.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: the importance of animal science flight simulators to enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of livestock production.Journal of animal science · 2026Review
- Monitoring changes in body reserves in gestating dairy heifers with 3-dimensional imaging technology: A potential tool to prevent early culling?JDS communications · 2026Article
- Computer vision analysis of luteal color Doppler ultrasonography for early and automated pregnancy diagnosis in Bos taurus beef cows.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Inter-evaluator bias and applicability of feline body condition score from visual assessment.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Assessment of thermal imaging to objectively body condition score mature horses and multiparous gestating beef cows.Translational animal science · 2025Article
- Computer vision algorithms to help decision-making in cattle production.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2024Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Heat Stress Management in Ruminant Livestock.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A first meta-analysis study on body weight prediction method for beef cattle based on digital image processing.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024Article
- Improving Dry Matter Intake Estimates Using Precision Body Weight on Cattle Grazed on Extensive Rangelands.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obtaining accurate body weight (BW) is crucial for management decisions yet can be a challenge for cow-calf producers. Fast-evolving technologies such as depth sensing have been identified as low-cost sensors for agricultural applications but have not been widely validated for U.S. beef cattle. This study aimed to (1) estimate the body volume of mature beef cows from depth images, (2) quantify BW and metabolic weight (MBW) from image-projected body volume, and (3) classify body condition scores (BCS) from image-obtained measurements using a machine-learning-based approach. Fifty-eight crossbred cows with a mean BW of 410.0 ± 60.3 kg and were between 4 and 6 yr of age were used for data collection between May and December 2021. A low-cost, commercially available depth sensor was used to collect top-view depth images. Images were processed to obtain cattle biometric measurements, including MBW, body length, average height, maximum body width, dorsal area, and projected body volume. The dataset was partitioned into training and testing datasets using an 80%:20% ratio. Using the training dataset, linear regression models were developed between image-projected body volume and BW measurements. Results were used to test BW predictions for the testing dataset. A machine-learning-based multivariate analysis was performed with 29 algorithms from eight classifiers to classify BCS using multiple inputs conveniently obtained from the cows and the depth images. A feature selection algorithm was performed to rank the relevance of each input to the BCS. Results demonstrated a strong positive correlation between the image-projected cow body volume and the measured BW (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.