Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583468›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

The live pig supply chain as reported by farmers in selected districts affected by African swine fever in Uganda, June and July 2022.

Margaret Nawatti, John E Ekakoro, David Singler, Krista Ochoa, Robinah Kizza, Dickson Ndoboli, Deo B Ndumu, Eddie M Wampande, Karyn A Havas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret NawattiDepartment of Political Science and Public Administration, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
John E EkakoroDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
David SinglerDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Krista OchoaDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Robinah KizzaCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Dickson NdoboliCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Deo B NdumuDepartment of Animal Health, Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry, and Fisheries, Entebbe, Uganda.
Eddie M WampandeCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Karyn A HavasDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Cornell University · USMakerere University · UGMinistry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Uganda is a pork-producing country in East Africa. The African swine fever virus (ASFV) has had a devastating impact on the country's pig industry. The movements of pigs and pork are a major pathway of spreading ASFV. This study was done to describe the live pig supply chain within and through districts that are impacted by African swine fever (ASF) in Uganda. Methods: A pig farmer survey in districts known to have ASFV was done using a semi-structured questionnaire available in English and two local languages. In total, 99 farmers were interviewed across five districts. Farmers were conveniently and purposively selected by local government veterinary officials. An online key informant survey was also used to validate farmer responses. Results: Most farmers interviewed in all districts reported to source and sell most of their pigs from within their district the farm was in, although there was variation by district and pig type. In relation to pig type, 89.7% of farmers sourced sows, 80.0% sourced boars, and 96.4% sourced weaned pigs from the district where the farm was located. As for sales, 91.3% of farmers sold sows, 92.7% sold boars, 91.9% sold weaned pigs, and 92.2% sold market pigs in the district where the farm was located. There was also variation to whom pigs were sold and sourced by pig type. Conclusion: This information is useful when planning the scale and focus of disease control programs based on animal movement. This study revealed that pig disease control programs can be targeted to smaller regions. Furthermore, there is a need for farmers and pig traders to be educated on and adhere to veterinary regulations of animal movement and good biosecurity practices to reduce disease spread when purchasing and selling pigs from known ASFV infected areas.

Indexed as

African swine feverbiosecuritypigsupply chainswineUganda

Identifiers

PMID37583468
PMCPMC10424570
OpenAlexW4385429576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.