Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583465›Full record

ArticleArtificial intelligence chemistry2023

Evaluating point-prediction uncertainties in neural networks for protein-ligand binding prediction.

Ya Ju Fan, Jonathan E Allen, Kevin S McLoughlin, Da Shi, Brian J Bennion, Xiaohua Zhang, Felice C Lightstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial intelligence chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ya Ju FanCenter for Applied Scientific Computing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA, USA.
Jonathan E AllenBiological Science and Security Center, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Kevin S McLoughlinBiological Science and Security Center, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Da ShiBiomedical Informatics and Data Science Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Brian J BennionPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Xiaohua ZhangPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Felice C LightstonePhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI PENDLETON, RICHARD · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
NCI NIH HHS 75N91019D00024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural Network (NN) models provide potential to speed up the drug discovery process and reduce its failure rates. The success of NN models requires uncertainty quantification (UQ) as drug discovery explores chemical space beyond the training data distribution. Standard NN models do not provide uncertainty information. Some methods require changing the NN architecture or training procedure, limiting the selection of NN models. Moreover, predictive uncertainty can come from different sources. It is important to have the ability to separately model different types of predictive uncertainty, as the model can take assorted actions depending on the source of uncertainty. In this paper, we examine UQ methods that estimate different sources of predictive uncertainty for NN models aiming at protein-ligand binding prediction. We use our prior knowledge on chemical compounds to design the experiments. By utilizing a visualization method we create non-overlapping and chemically diverse partitions from a collection of chemical compounds. These partitions are used as training and test set splits to explore NN model uncertainty. We demonstrate how the uncertainties estimated by the selected methods describe different sources of uncertainty under different partitions and featurization schemes and the relationship to prediction error.

Indexed as

Applicability domainDrug discoveryNeural networksUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID37583465
PMCPMC10426331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.