Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583464›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2023

The effect of exercise and physical activity-interventions on step count and intensity level in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ellen Christin Arntzen, Razieh Bidhendi-Yarandi, Marianne Sivertsen, Karina Knutsen, Stine Susanne Haakonsen Dahl, Maria Grytvik Hartvedt, Britt Normann, Samira Behboudi-Gandevani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ellen Christin ArntzenFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Razieh Bidhendi-YarandiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Marianne SivertsenPhysiotherapy Department, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway.
Karina KnutsenFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Stine Susanne Haakonsen DahlFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Maria Grytvik HartvedtFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Britt NormannFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Samira Behboudi-GandevaniFaculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reduced physical activity is a worldwide challenge in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify devise-measured effects of physical activity, exercise and physiotherapy-interventions on step count and intensity level of physical activity in individuals with MS. Methods: A systematic search of the databases of PubMed (including Medline), Scopus, CINHAL and Web of Science was carried out to retrieve studies published in the English language from the inception to the first of May 2023. All trials concerning the effectiveness of different types of exercise on step count and intensity level in people with MS were included. The quality of the included studies and their risk of bias were critically appraised using The modified consolidated standards of reporting trials and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI of the step-count outcome and moderate to vigorous intensity level before versus after treatment were estimated in both Intervention and Control groups using the random effect model. The Harbord test were used to account for heterogeneity between studies and assess publication bias, respectively. Further sensitivity analysis helped with the verification of the reliability and stability of our review results. Results: A total of 8 randomized clinical trials (involving 919 individuals with MS) were included. The participants (including 715 (77.8%) female and 204 (22.2%) male) had been randomly assigned to the Intervention ( Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis showed no significant differences in step count and moderate to vigorous physical activity level among individuals with MS, both within and between groups receiving physical activity interventions. More studies that objectively measure physical activity are needed. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022343621.

Indexed as

exercisemultiple sclerosisphysical activityphysiotherapysteps-count

Identifiers

PMID37583464
PMCPMC10425270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.