ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock
Emergency Department Point-of-Care Tests during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation to Predict Cardiac Arrest Outcomes.
Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide in patients with cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Intra-arrest blood-based biomarkers for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated the role of point-of-care tests (POCT) such as blood lactate, anion gap (AG), base deficit, pH, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and troponin as the predictors of cardiac arrest outcomes in the emergency department (ED). Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study in the ED of a tertiary care hospital in India. All the adult patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the ED were included in the study. Blood samples were collected within 10 min of initiation of CPR for assay of POCTs. Outcomes assessed were the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 24-h survival, survival to hospital discharge (STHD), survival at 7 days, and favorable neurological outcome (FNO) at day 7 of admission. Results: One hundred and fifty-one patients were included in the study (median age: 50 years, 65% males). Out of 151 cases, ROSC, survival at 7 days, STHD, and FNO was observed in 86 patients, six patients, five patients, and two patients, respectively. "No-ROSC" could be significantly predicted by raised lactate (odds ratio [OR]: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.22) and NT-proBNP (OR: 1.05, 1.01-1.09) values at the time of cardiac arrest. "24-h mortality" could be significantly predicted by the raised lactate (OR: 1.14, 1.01-1.28), low arterial pH (OR: 0.05, 0.01-0.52), raised AG (OR: 1.08, 1.01-1.15), and lower base deficit (<-15) (OR: 1.07, 1.01-1.14). None of the other POCTs was found to be a predictor of other cardiac arrest outcomes. Conclusion: Among various POCTs, raised lactate assayed within 10 min of cardiac arrest can predict poor outcomes like "no-ROSC" and 24-h mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.