Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37583084›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2023

Hydration Status Assessment in Older Patients.

Linda Deißler, Rainer Wirth, Birgit Frilling, Matthias Janneck, Alexander Rösler

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pre-Hydration and a Forced Diuresis Protocol forJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Screening Tool For Dehydration Risk.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Article
  10. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linda DeißlerMedical Faculty, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany; Albertinen House - Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Hamburg, Germany; Albertinen Cardiovascular Center, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Geriatrics, Agaplesion Bethesda Hospital HH-Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Rainer Wirth
Birgit Frilling
Matthias Janneck
Alexander Rösler
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHydration disturbances are common in old age: the reported prevalence of dehydration in elderly patients ranges from 19% to 89%, depending on the definition and the population in question. However, the clinical assessment of patients' hydration status is difficult. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic value of currently used methods that may or may not be suitable for assessing older patients' hydration status.

methodsWe conducted a selective literature search for relevant studies concerning patients aged 65 and above. Of the 355 articles retrieved by the initial search, a multistep selection process yielded 30 that were suitable for inclusion in this review.

results107 different methods for the diagnostic assessment of dehydration in older persons were evaluated on the basis of the reviewed publications. High diagnostic value, especially for the determination of hyperosmolar dehydration, was found for serum osmolality, serum sodium concentration, inferior vena cava ultrasonography, a history (from the patient or another informant) of not drinking between meals, and axillary dryness. On the other hand, a variety of clinical signs such as a positive skin turgor test, sunken eyes, dry mouth, tachycardia, orthostatic dysregulation, and dark urine were found to be of inadequate diagnostic value.

conclusionOnly five of the 107 methods considered appear to be suitable for determining that a patient is dehydrated. Thus, the available scientific evidence indicates that all clinicians should critically reconsider their own techniques for assessing hydration status in elderly patients. To optimize the clinical assessment of patients' hydration status, there seems to be a need for the rejection of unsuitable methods in favor of either newly developed criteria or of a combination of the best criteria already in use.

Indexed as

DehydrationAgedAged, 80 and overHumansOsmolar Concentration

Identifiers

PMID37583084
PMCPMC10644957
OpenAlexW4385851642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.