Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37582973›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2023

Is the answer to reducing early childhood caries in your pocket?

Helen Fegan, Rachel Hutchinson

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helen FeganSchool of Dentistry, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. hfegan514@gmail.com.
Rachel HutchinsonSchool of Dentistry, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

data sourcesElectronic scientific databases Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science were systematically searched and restricted to articles published from 1996 onwards and limited to articles published in English. This was carried out following an initial scoping search using keywords conducted in PubMed. STUDY SELECTION: Original studies investigating the use of mobile phone applications as a delivery method of healthcare interventions to parents and caregivers with children ≤6 years of age were included. As this was a mixed-methods systematic review, studies that have quantitative clinical outcomes and also qualitative outcomes of experiences, attitudes and beliefs of parents and caregivers were included. EndNote X8.2 and Rayyan.ai software was employed for title and abstract screening. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Three independent authors developed a combined data extraction tool to examine titles, abstracts and full texts of relevant articles against the inclusion criteria. The development of this tool was guided by the JBI reviewer's manual. Data extraction was completed by one reviewer, and verified by two further reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Retrieved studies were assessed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data extracted included study reference information, study design, setting, sample sizes and intervention characteristics. A risk of bias assessment was undertaken using the Quality Appraisal for Diverse Studies tool, and a further risk assessment of quantitative and mixed methods studies.

resultsFrom 5953 studies initially identified, 5 studies were included in the review. One study identified using a gamification design within a mobile health app to promote oral health had statistically significant improvements in plaque and gingival indices compared to a control group at both a 6 and 12-week recall. Two studies reported a significant improvement in maternal knowledge of children's oral health as a result of using an oral health app.

conclusionsThe delivery of oral health promotion through mobile health apps may be effective in reducing early childhood caries through improving health literacy in parents and caregivers, however key challenges in the app development process exist surrounding privacy issues and data protection.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneDental CariesBiasChildChild, PreschoolDental Caries SusceptibilityHumansOral HealthSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID37582973
OpenAlexW4385839602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.