ArticleScientific reports2023
Artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinformatics reveals the prognostic potential of manganese metabolism-related genes in lung adenocarcinoma.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Evaluating machine learning algorithms for accurate prediction of yearling weight in Magra sheep.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- A comparative evaluation of machine learning algorithms for predicting chicken egg weight from egg quality traits.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- Application of XGBoost and Random Forest algorithms for body weight prediction in Blackbelly sheep using biometric measurements.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Reply to the comment on: comparison of machine learning algorithms and multiple linear regression for live weight estimation of Akkaraman lambs.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- From machine learning to digital twin integration for livestock production and research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Prediction of body weight in indigenous sheep using random forest regression, support vector regression, and classification and regression trees algorithms.Veterinary and animal science · 2025Article
- Early prediction of final weight in nomadic sheep flocks using machine learning algorithms.Tropical animal health and production · 2025Article
- Predicting Weaning Weight of Romanov Lambs From Biometric Measurements Before Weaning Age Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Predicting genetic merit in Harnali sheep using machine learning techniques.Tropical animal health and production · 2025Article
- Predicting Live Weight for Female Rabbits of Meat Crosses From Body Measurements Using LightGBM, XGBoost and Support Vector Machine Algorithms.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Comparison of machine learning algorithms and multiple linear regression for live weight estimation of Akkaraman lambs.Tropical animal health and production · 2024Article
- Prediction of Body Weight by Using PCA-Supported Gradient Boosting and Random Forest Algorithms in Water Buffaloes (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a rapidly transforming world, farm data is growing exponentially. Realizing the importance of this data, researchers are looking for new solutions to analyse this data and make farming predictions. Artificial Intelligence, with its capacity to handle big data is rapidly becoming popular. In addition, it can also handle non-linear, noisy data and is not limited by the conditions required for conventional data analysis. This study was therefore undertaken to compare the most popular machine learning (ML) algorithms and rank them as per their ability to make predictions on sheep farm data spanning 11 years. Data was cleaned and prepared was done before analysis. Winsorization was done for outlier removal. Principal component analysis (PCA) and feature selection (FS) were done and based on that, three datasets were created viz. PCA (wherein only PCA was used), PCA+ FS (both techniques used for dimensionality reduction), and FS (only feature selection used) bodyweight prediction. Among the 11 ML algorithms that were evaluated, the correlations between true and predicted values for MARS algorithm, Bayesian ridge regression, Ridge regression, Support Vector Machines, Gradient boosting algorithm, Random forests, XgBoost algorithm, Artificial neural networks, Classification and regression trees, Polynomial regression, K nearest neighbours and Genetic Algorithms were 0.993, 0.992, 0.991, 0.991, 0.991, 0.99, 0.99, 0.984, 0.984, 0.957, 0.949, 0.734 respectively for bodyweights. The top five algorithms for the prediction of bodyweights, were MARS, Bayesian ridge regression, Ridge regression, Support Vector Machines and Gradient boosting algorithm. A total of 12 machine learning models were developed for the prediction of bodyweights in sheep in the present study. It may be said that machine learning techniques can perform predictions with reasonable accuracies and can thus help in drawing inferences and making futuristic predictions on farms for their economic prosperity, performance improvement and subsequently food security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.