Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37582928›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Effect of diotic versus dichotic presentation on the pitch perception of tone complexes at medium and very high frequencies.

Hedwig E Gockel, Robert P Carlyon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hedwig E GockelMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK. hedwig.gockel@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.
Robert P CarlyonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Difference limens for fundamental frequency (F0), F0DLs, are usually small for complex tones containing low harmonics that are resolved in the auditory periphery, but worsen when the rank of the lowest harmonic increases above about 6-8 and harmonics become less resolved. The traditional explanation for this, in terms of resolvability, has been challenged and an alternative explanation in terms of harmonic rank was suggested. Here, to disentangle the effects of resolvability and harmonic rank the complex tones were presented either diotically (all harmonics to both ears) or dichotically (even and odd harmonics to opposite ears); the latter increases resolvability but does not affect harmonic rank. F0DLs were measured for 14 listeners for complex tones containing harmonics 6-10 with F0s of 280 and 1400 Hz, presented diotically or dichotically. For the low F0, F0DLs were significantly lower for the dichotic than for the diotic condition. This is consistent with a benefit of increased resolvability of harmonics for F0 discrimination and extends previous results to harmonics as low as the sixth. In contrast, for the high F0, F0DLs were similar for the two presentation modes, adding to evidence for differences in pitch perception between tones with low-to-medium and very-high frequency content.

Indexed as

Pitch DiscriminationPitch PerceptionAcoustic StimulationNiacinamideNiacinamide

Identifiers

PMID37582928
PMCPMC10427668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.