Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37582755›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2023

Impact of data source choice on multimorbidity measurement: a comparison study of 2.3 million individuals in the Welsh National Health Service.

Clare MacRae, Daniel Morales, Stewart W Mercer, Nazir Lone, Andrew Lawson, Emily Jefferson, David McAllister, Marjan van den Akker, Alan Marshall, Sohan Seth and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The kidney failure risk equation in people with CKD and multimorbidity: the effect of competing mortality risks.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frailty in Adults with CKD and Validation of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation in Frailty Subgroups.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Clare MacRaeAdvanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Bio Cube 1, Edinburgh BioQuarter, 13 Little France Road, Edinburgh, UK. clare.macrae@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-683X
Daniel MoralesDivision of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Stewart W MercerAdvanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Bio Cube 1, Edinburgh BioQuarter, 13 Little France Road, Edinburgh, UK.
Nazir LoneUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew LawsonUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Emily JeffersonDivision of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
David McAllisterPublic Health, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 9LX, UK.
Marjan van den AkkerInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Alan MarshallSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Chrystal Macmillan Building, Edinburgh, EH8 9LD, UK.
Sohan SethSchool of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Anna RawlingsSwansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Campus, Swansea, UK.
Jane LyonsSwansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Campus, Swansea, UK.
Ronan A LyonsSwansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Campus, Swansea, UK.
Amy MizenSwansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Campus, Swansea, UK.
Eleojo AbubakarPublic Health, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 9LX, UK.
Chris DibbenUniversity of Edinburgh Institute of Geography, Institute of Geography Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Bruce GuthrieAdvanced Care Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Bio Cube 1, Edinburgh BioQuarter, 13 Little France Road, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBGoethe University Frankfurt · DEMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Department of Health NIHR202639HCRW_ HF-19-1651Medical Research Council MR/W000253/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasurement of multimorbidity in research is variable, including the choice of the data source used to ascertain conditions. We compared the estimated prevalence of multimorbidity and associations with mortality using different data sources.

methodsA cross-sectional study of SAIL Databank data including 2,340,027 individuals of all ages living in Wales on 01 January 2019. Comparison of prevalence of multimorbidity and constituent 47 conditions using data from primary care (PC), hospital inpatient (HI), and linked PC-HI data sources and examination of associations between condition count and 12-month mortality.

resultsUsing linked PC-HI compared with only HI data, multimorbidity was more prevalent (32.2% versus 16.5%), and the population of people identified as having multimorbidity was younger (mean age 62.5 versus 66.8 years) and included more women (54.2% versus 52.6%). Individuals with multimorbidity in both PC and HI data had stronger associations with mortality than those with multimorbidity only in HI data (adjusted odds ratio 8.34 [95% CI 8.02-8.68] versus 6.95 (95%CI 6.79-7.12] in people with ≥ 4 conditions). The prevalence of conditions identified using only PC versus only HI data was significantly higher for 37/47 and significantly lower for 10/47: the highest PC/HI ratio was for depression (14.2 [95% CI 14.1-14.4]) and the lowest for aneurysm (0.51 [95% CI 0.5-0.5]). Agreement in ascertainment of conditions between the two data sources varied considerably, being slight for five (kappa < 0.20), fair for 12 (kappa 0.21-0.40), moderate for 16 (kappa 0.41-0.60), and substantial for 12 (kappa 0.61-0.80) conditions, and by body system was lowest for mental and behavioural disorders. The percentage agreement, individuals with a condition identified in both PC and HI data, was lowest in anxiety (4.6%) and highest in coronary artery disease (62.9%).

conclusionsThe use of single data sources may underestimate prevalence when measuring multimorbidity and many important conditions (especially mental and behavioural disorders). Caution should be used when interpreting findings of research examining individual and multiple long-term conditions using single data sources. Where available, researchers using electronic health data should link primary care and hospital inpatient data to generate more robust evidence to support evidence-based healthcare planning decisions for people with multimorbidity.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityState MedicineChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInformation SourcesMiddle AgedPrevalenceElectronic health recordsEpidemiologyMultimorbidity

Identifiers

PMID37582755
PMCPMC10426056
OpenAlexW4385838585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.