Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37582610›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2023

Interpolated retrieval retroactively increases recall and promotes cross-episode memory interdependence.

Christopher N Wahlheim, Sydney T Smith, Sydney M Garlitch, Robert W Wiley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher N WahlheimDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina 27402, USA cnwahlhe@uncg.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2381-1493
Sydney T SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina 27402, USA.
Sydney M GarlitchBehavioral Sciences Department, Millikin University, Decatur, Illinois 62522, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9328-0977
Robert W WileyDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina 27402, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1853-8063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieving existing memories before new learning can lead to retroactive facilitation. Three experiments examined whether interpolated retrieval is associated with retroactive facilitation and memory interdependence that reflects integrative encoding. Participants studied two lists of cue-response word pairs that repeated across lists (A-B, A-B), appeared in list 1 (A-B, -), or included the same cues with changed responses in each list (A-B, A-C). For A-B, A-C pairs, the tasks interpolated between lists required recall of list 1 (B) responses (with or without feedback) or restudy of complete list 1 (A-B) pairs. In list 2, participants only studied pairs (experiment 1) or studied pairs, attempted to detect changed (C) responses, and attempted to recall list 1 responses for detected changes (experiments 2 and 3). On a final cued recall test, participants attempted to recall list 1 responses, indicated whether responses changed between lists, and if so, attempted to recall list 2 responses. Interpolated retrieval was associated with subsequent retroactive facilitation and greater memory interdependence for B and C responses. These correlational findings are compatible with the view that retrieval retroactively facilitates memories, promotes coactivation of existing memories and new learning, and enables integrative encoding that veridically binds information across episodes.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicMental RecallCuesHumansLearning

Identifiers

PMID37582610
PMCPMC10519378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.