ArticleNursing research
Integration of Person-Centered Narratives Into the Electronic Health Record.
Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of standardized patient combined with narrative nursing teaching on experimental teaching of surgical nursing: A quasi-experimental study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCare delivery that is not person-centered has been called discordant care . There has been a shift to incorporate more of a person's narrative into their individual healthcare treatment plan to reduce discordant care. Aligning with this shift in healthcare delivery, we developed a person-centered narrative intervention (PCNI) to address existing gaps in delivery of person-centered care.
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized study and describe the outcomes of PCNI to usual care on the following person (patient)-reported outcomes: perceptions of the quality of communication with their nurses and their psychosocial and existential well-being.
methodsThis study's design was an Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials model Phase II proof-of-concept randomized study. The participants were people admitted to an acute care hospital diagnosed with heart failure and/or end-stage renal disease.
resultsDespite COVID-19 challenges, the PCNI was feasible in an acute care setting; it showed a moderate positive difference between conditions in the person's perception of their quality of communication and a small positive difference in their perception of feeling heard and understood. For our secondary outcomes of anxiety, depression, and psychosocial illness effect, there were small or no effects in the acute care setting. DISCUSSION: Using a person-centered narrative, such as the PCNI, can help inform delivery of care that incorporates a person's (patient's) beliefs, values, and preferences into their healthcare. This study used a pragmatic approach to evaluate the PCNI in real time in an acute care setting to assess patient-reported outcomes. These positive results in a small sample indicate the need for continued testing of the PCNI. These promising effects require further testing in a Phase III efficacy study within a larger randomized controlled clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.