Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37582265›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2023

Acceptance of Telemedicine Compared to In-Person Consultation From the Providers' and Users' Perspectives: Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Dermatology.

Lara Valeska Maul, Anna Sophie Jahn, Gustavo S P Pamplona, Markus Streit, Lorena Gantenbein, Simon Müller, Mia-Louise Nielsen, Christian Greis, Alexander A Navarini, Julia-Tatjana Maul

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04495036 (Acceptance of Telemedicine in Dermatology Patients, Physicians and Medical Staff), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04495036 completednot on this map

Acceptance of Telemedicine in Dermatology Patients, Physicians and Medical Staff

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2019 to 2020Enrolled683ConditionsDermatologic DiseaseArmsdata collection (21-items-patient descriptive survey), data collection (23-items-physician descriptive survey)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lara Valeska MaulDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9202-0073
Anna Sophie JahnDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0651-1463
Gustavo S P PamplonaJules-Gonin Eye Hospital/Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0278-203X
Markus StreitDepartment of Dermatology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0219-4847
Lorena GantenbeinDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5138-759X
Simon MüllerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0200-4254
Mia-Louise NielsenDepartment of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1562-8568
Christian GreisDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-2010
Alexander A NavariniDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-632X
Julia-Tatjana MaulDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-1545
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHBispebjerg Hospital · DKETH Zurich · CHKantonsspital Aarau · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeledermatology is currently finding its place in modern health care worldwide as a rapidly evolving field.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the acceptance of teledermatology compared to in-person consultation from the perspective of patients and professionals.

methodsThis multicenter, cross-sectional pilot study was performed at secondary and tertiary referral centers of dermatology in Switzerland from August 2019 to January 2020. A customized questionnaire addressing demographics and educational data, experience with telemedicine, and presumed willingness to replace in-patient consultations with teledermatology was completed by dermatological patients, dermatologists, and health care workers in dermatology.

resultsAmong a total of 664 participants, the ones with previous telemedicine experience (171/664, 25.8%) indicated a high level of overall experience with it (patients: 73/106, 68.9%, dermatologists: 6/8, 75.0%, and health care workers: 27/34, 79.4%). Patients, dermatologists, and health care workers were most likely willing to replace in-person consultations with teledermatology for minor health issues (353/512, 68.9%; 37/45, 82.2%; and 89/107, 83.2%, respectively). We observed a higher preference for telemedicine among individuals who have already used telemedicine (patients: P<.001, dermatologists: P=.03, and health care workers, P=.005), as well as among patients with higher educational levels (P=.003).

conclusionsThis study indicates that the preference for teledermatology has a high potential to increase over time since previous experience with telemedicine and a higher level of education were associated with a higher willingness to replace in-patient consultations with telemedicine. We assume that minor skin problems are the most promising issue in teledermatology. Our findings emphasize the need for dermatologists to be actively involved in the transition to teledermatology.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04495036; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04495036.

Indexed as

acceptancepatientphysiciansatisfactionteledermatology

Identifiers

PMID37582265
PMCPMC10457706
OpenAlexW4380081708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.