ArticleRadiological physics and technology2023
The influence of image reconstruction methods on the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema with convolutional neural network.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a near infrared spectroscopy based method for the estimation of substance P in saliva of patients with COPD.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of iterative reconstruction (IR) methods on computed tomography (CT) images when training convolutional neural network (CNN) models to diagnose pulmonary emphysema. To evaluate the influence of the IR algorithm on CNN, the present study comprised two steps: the comparison of noise reduction by IR algorithms using phantom examinations and the change in performance of CNN with IR algorithms using patient data. We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients. Raw CT data were reconstructed using the filtered back-projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) algorithms with blending levels of 30%, 50%, and 70%. The models were trained using reconstructed CT images and were named the FBP, ASIR-V30, ASIR-V50, and ASIR-V70 models. The mean and the standard deviation of the CT values were 11.3 ± 21.2 at FBP, 11.0 ± 17.3 at ASIR-V30, 11.0 ± 14.4 at ASIR-V50, and 11.0 ± 11.8 at ASIR-V70. For all the evaluation metrics, the best values were obtained with the FBP model applied to the ASIR-V70 test images. The worst values were obtained with the ASIR-V70 model applied to the FBP test images. The model trained with FBP images exhibited significantly better performance than the models trained using IR images. The reduction in image noise with the IR algorithm on the test images contributed to improving the accuracy of the classification of emphysema subtypes using CNN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37581714What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.