ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Deep learning enables the differentiation between early and late stages of hip avascular necrosis.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning in the diagnosis, staging, and prognosis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Applications and performance of imaging artificial intelligence in detecting and staging avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning models for osteonecrosis of the femoral head on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance, staging accuracy, and external generalizability.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in MRI for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prompt Configurations for Multimodal Large Language Models in Diagnosing and Staging Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Multimodel Retrospective Observational Diagnostic Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Global Attention Mechanism-Enhanced Deep Learning for Multi-Sequence MRI Diagnosis of Early Femoral Head Osteonecrosis.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- An Explainable Plane-Wise ConvNet Approach for Detecting Femoral Head Osteonecrosis from Magnetic Resonance Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radiomics and deep learning model based on X-ray imaging for the assisted diagnosis of early Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Variability in the classification, management, and outcome reporting for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- X-ray based radiomics machine learning models for predicting collapse of early-stage osteonecrosis of femoral head.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning analysis for rheumatologic imaging: current trends, future directions, and the role of human.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2025Review
- Prediction of femoral head collapse in osteonecrosis using deep learning segmentation and radiomics texture analysis of MRI.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Deep learning approach to femoral AVN detection in digital radiography: differentiating patients and pre-collapse stages.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- A single sequence MRI-based deep learning radiomics model in the diagnosis of early osteonecrosis of femoral head.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a deep learning methodology that distinguishes early from late stages of avascular necrosis of the hip (AVN) to determine treatment decisions.
methodsThree convolutional neural networks (CNNs) VGG-16, Inception ResnetV2, InceptionV3 were trained with transfer learning (ImageNet) and finetuned with a retrospectively collected cohort of (n = 104) MRI examinations of AVN patients, to differentiate between early (ARCO 1-2) and late (ARCO 3-4) stages. A consensus CNN ensemble decision was recorded as the agreement of at least two CNNs. CNN and ensemble performance was benchmarked on an independent cohort of 49 patients from another country and was compared to the performance of two MSK radiologists. CNN performance was expressed with areas under the curve (AUC), the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and precision, and recall and f1-scores. AUCs were compared with DeLong's test.
resultsOn internal testing, Inception-ResnetV2 achieved the highest individual performance with an AUC of 99.7% (95%CI 99-100%), followed by InceptionV3 and VGG-16 with AUCs of 99.3% (95%CI 98.4-100%) and 97.3% (95%CI 95.5-99.2%) respectively. The CNN ensemble the same AUCs Inception ResnetV2. On external validation, model performance dropped with VGG-16 achieving the highest individual AUC of 78.9% (95%CI 51.6-79.6%) The best external performance was achieved by the model ensemble with an AUC of 85.5% (95%CI 72.2-93.9%). No significant difference was found between the CNN ensemble and expert MSK radiologists (p = 0.22 and 0.092 respectively).
conclusionAn externally validated CNN ensemble accurately distinguishes between the early and late stages of AVN and has comparable performance to expert MSK radiologists. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This paper introduces the use of deep learning for the differentiation between early and late avascular necrosis of the hip, assisting in a complex clinical decision that can determine the choice between conservative and surgical treatment. KEY POINTS: • A convolutional neural network ensemble achieved excellent performance in distinguishing between early and late avascular necrosis. • The performance of the deep learning method was similar to the performance of expert readers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.