Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37581656›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Deep learning enables the differentiation between early and late stages of hip avascular necrosis.

Michail E Klontzas, Evangelia E Vassalou, Konstantinos Spanakis, Felix Meurer, Klaus Woertler, Aristeidis Zibis, Kostas Marias, Apostolos H Karantanas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michail E KlontzasDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes Campus, Heraklion, Greece.
Evangelia E VassalouDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes Campus, Heraklion, Greece.
Konstantinos SpanakisDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes Campus, Heraklion, Greece.
Felix MeurerMusculoskeletal Radiology Section, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Klaus WoertlerMusculoskeletal Radiology Section, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Aristeidis ZibisDepartment of Anatomy, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Neofytou 9 St., 41223, Larissa, Greece.
Kostas MariasComputational BioMedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Apostolos H KarantanasDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes Campus, Heraklion, Greece. akarantanas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-2403

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a deep learning methodology that distinguishes early from late stages of avascular necrosis of the hip (AVN) to determine treatment decisions.

methodsThree convolutional neural networks (CNNs) VGG-16, Inception ResnetV2, InceptionV3 were trained with transfer learning (ImageNet) and finetuned with a retrospectively collected cohort of (n = 104) MRI examinations of AVN patients, to differentiate between early (ARCO 1-2) and late (ARCO 3-4) stages. A consensus CNN ensemble decision was recorded as the agreement of at least two CNNs. CNN and ensemble performance was benchmarked on an independent cohort of 49 patients from another country and was compared to the performance of two MSK radiologists. CNN performance was expressed with areas under the curve (AUC), the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and precision, and recall and f1-scores. AUCs were compared with DeLong's test.

resultsOn internal testing, Inception-ResnetV2 achieved the highest individual performance with an AUC of 99.7% (95%CI 99-100%), followed by InceptionV3 and VGG-16 with AUCs of 99.3% (95%CI 98.4-100%) and 97.3% (95%CI 95.5-99.2%) respectively. The CNN ensemble the same AUCs Inception ResnetV2. On external validation, model performance dropped with VGG-16 achieving the highest individual AUC of 78.9% (95%CI 51.6-79.6%) The best external performance was achieved by the model ensemble with an AUC of 85.5% (95%CI 72.2-93.9%). No significant difference was found between the CNN ensemble and expert MSK radiologists (p = 0.22 and 0.092 respectively).

conclusionAn externally validated CNN ensemble accurately distinguishes between the early and late stages of AVN and has comparable performance to expert MSK radiologists. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This paper introduces the use of deep learning for the differentiation between early and late avascular necrosis of the hip, assisting in a complex clinical decision that can determine the choice between conservative and surgical treatment. KEY POINTS: • A convolutional neural network ensemble achieved excellent performance in distinguishing between early and late avascular necrosis. • The performance of the deep learning method was similar to the performance of expert readers.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOsteonecrosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceDeep learningHipNecrosis, avascular of boneOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID37581656
PMCPMC10853078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.