Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37581652›Full record

SynthesisGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

The effect of different pterygium surgery techniques on the ocular surface parameters in different durations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jingyao Chang, Qian Cao, Jingyan Yong, Xinru Ling, Xiaoran Zhang, Zhen Kang, Chunyan Xue

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Z-shaped incision without epithelial resection in pterygium surgery.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jingyao ChangSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3443-7230
Qian CaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China.
Jingyan YongSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China.
Xinru LingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaoran ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China.
Zhen KangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China.
Chunyan XueSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China. xuechunyan@nju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-2011
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effects of different pterygium surgery techniques on ocular surface (OS) in different follow-up periods.

methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, and China Biology Medicine disc were searched for studies reporting pre- and post-operative OS parameters in pterygium.

resultsA total of 33 articles were finally included. Three OS parameters showed relatively consistent changing trends after surgery including ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear film break-up time (BUT), and score of corneal fluorescein staining (SCFS). They worsened significantly at 1w post-operation and then gradually improved: OSDI and BUT showed obvious improvement in 1 m post-operation (SMD =  - 0.58, 95%CI = [- 1.04, - 0.13]; SMD = 0.42, 95%CI = [0.06, 0.78]); SCFS was restored to preoperative levels in 3 m after surgery (SMD =  - 0.54, 95%CI = [- 1.16, 0.07]). Another parameter, Schirmer test without anesthesia (SIT), presented transient increase at 1w post-operation (SMD = 0.87, 95%CI = [0.27, 1.47]) and presented a relatively stable improvement after 1 m post-operation (SMD = 0.52, 95%CI = [0.16, 0.89]). All parameters in amniotic membrane graft (AMT) showed better improvement in early stage and they showed non-inferior improvements in the long term compared with conjunctival autograft (CAG). Limbal-conjunctival autograft (LCAG) made excellent improvement to OS in the long term while pterygium excision (PE) showed the worst OS. The type of pterygium (primary and secondary), diabetes mellitus (DM) status, and fixation method had certain effects on the results.

conclusionsOS of pterygium is deteriorated at 1w post-operation then gradually improved to preoperative levels after 1 m post-operation. Among various surgery techniques, LCAG had the best improvement to OS which especially displayed in the long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

ConjunctivaOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresPterygiumCorneaDry Eye SyndromesHumansTearsTime FactorsAmniotic membrane graftConjunctival autograftLimbal conjunctival autograftOcular surfacePterygium surgeryTear film

Identifiers

PMID37581652
OpenAlexW4385827647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.