ReviewRadiology2023
MRI Advancements in Musculoskeletal Clinical and Research Practice.
Review in Radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses for the ARCO Clinical Practice Guideline Development Workgroup.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Shortening MRI scanning time for acute ischemic stroke: analysis of the effect of 3.0T MRI compressed sensing deep learning reconstruction.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Routine MRI Signal Intensity as a Surrogate of Subchondral Bone Healing: Validation Against Micro-CT and Histology in an Ovine Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Grading knee cartilage degeneration and meniscal injury with combined ACS-accelerated T1ρ and T2 mapping.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Enhancing resolution and image quality in musculoskeletal MRI using deep learning reconstruction.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of ultrasonographic imaging in athletic elbow injuries: a compartment-based approach.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- How deep resolve affects the stability of texture features for different MR image acceleration methods - a phantom and a human brain study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Current Uses for Medical Imaging With Orthopaedic Implant Technology.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Review
- The Development and Challenges of PET/MRI Dual-Modality Imaging Probes-An Update.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Magnetic Resonance Neurography Findings in Clinically Suspected Posterior Interosseous Neuropathy.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Estimation of time-to-total knee replacement surgery with multimodal modeling and artificial intelligence.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Recent topics in musculoskeletal imaging focused on clinical applications of AI: How should radiologists approach and use AI?La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Super-resolution synthetic MRI using deep learning reconstruction for accurate diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Automated elbow ultrasound image recognition: a two-stage deep learning system via Swin Transformer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Diagnosis: A Comparative Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Managing hardware-related metal artifacts in MRI: current and evolving techniques.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
- Present and future of whole-body MRI in metastatic disease and myeloma: how and why you will do it.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
- Modern low-field MRI.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
- MRI in MSK: is it the ultimate examination?Skeletal radiology · 2024Article
- Editorial Comment: Selected Proceedings From the 2023 Bernese Hip Symposium.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decades, MRI has become increasingly important for diagnosing and longitudinally monitoring musculoskeletal disorders, with ongoing hardware and software improvements aiming to optimize image quality and speed. However, surging demand for musculoskeletal MRI and increased interest to provide more personalized care will necessitate a stronger emphasis on efficiency and specificity. Ongoing hardware developments include more powerful gradients, improvements in wide-bore magnet designs to maintain field homogeneity, and high-channel phased-array coils. There is also interest in low-field-strength magnets with inherently lower magnetic footprints and operational costs to accommodate global demand in middle- and low-income countries. Previous approaches to decrease acquisition times by means of conventional acceleration techniques (eg, parallel imaging or compressed sensing) are now largely overshadowed by deep learning reconstruction algorithms. It is expected that greater emphasis will be placed on improving synthetic MRI and MR fingerprinting approaches to shorten overall acquisition times while also addressing the demand of personalized care by simultaneously capturing microstructural information to provide greater detail of disease severity. Authors also anticipate increased research emphasis on metal artifact reduction techniques, bone imaging, and MR neurography to meet clinical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.