Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37581387›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2023

Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Anchored Reentry Substrate Created by Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Computational Models.

Savannah F Bifulco, Fima Macheret, Griffin D Scott, Nazem Akoum, Patrick M Boyle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Impact of effective refractory period personalization on arrhythmia vulnerability in patient-specific atrial computer models.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Savannah F BifulcoDepartment of Bioengineering University of Washington Seattle WA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6679-6716
Fima MacheretDivision of Cardiology University of Washington Seattle WA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-8712
Griffin D ScottDepartment of Bioengineering University of Washington Seattle WA USA.
Nazem AkoumDepartment of Bioengineering University of Washington Seattle WA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2001-6806
Patrick M BoyleDepartment of Bioengineering University of Washington Seattle WA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9048-1239
University of Washington · US

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Mechanistic Relationships Between Fibrosis, Fibrillation, and Stroke: Multi-Scale, Multi-Physics SimulationsR01HL158667 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Patrick M Boyle · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
Bioengineering Cardiovascular Training Grant (BCTG)T32EB032787 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MICHAEL REGNIER, Ying Zheng · 2022 to 2026
$969k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL158667NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB032787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Postablation arrhythmia recurrence occurs in ~40% of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Fibrotic remodeling exacerbates arrhythmic activity in persistent atrial fibrillation and can play a key role in reentrant arrhythmia, but emergent interaction between nonconductive ablation-induced scar and native fibrosis (ie, residual fibrosis) is poorly understood. Methods and Results We conducted computational simulations in pre- and postablation left atrial models reconstructed from late gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans to test the hypothesis that ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation creates new substrate conducive to recurrent arrhythmia mediated by anchored reentry. We trained a random forest machine learning classifier to accurately pinpoint specific nonconductive tissue regions (ie, areas of ablation-delivered scar or vein/valve boundaries) with the capacity to serve as substrate for anchored reentry-driven recurrent arrhythmia (area under the curve: 0.91±0.03). Our analysis suggests there is a distinctive nonconductive tissue pattern prone to serving as arrhythmogenic substrate in postablation models, defined by a specific size and proximity to residual fibrosis. Conclusions Overall, this suggests persistent atrial fibrillation ablation transforms substrate that favors functional reentry (ie, rotors meandering in excitable tissue) into an arrhythmogenic milieu more conducive to anchored reentry. Our work also indicates that explainable machine learning and computational simulations can be combined to effectively probe mechanisms of recurrent arrhythmia.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationCicatrixComputer SimulationFibrosisHeart AtriaHumansMachine LearningRecurrenceTreatment Outcomeablationatrial fibrillationcomputational modelingmachine learningrecurrent arrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID37581387
PMCPMC10492949
OpenAlexW4385721049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.