Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37581305›Full record

ReviewBiology open2023

A Year at the Forefront of Gliding Locomotion.

Pranav C Khandelwal, Mohamed A Zakaria, John J Socha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pranav C KhandelwalMax Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Stuttgart 70569, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0589-4467
Mohamed A ZakariaDepartment of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3840-3868
John J SochaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4465-1097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review highlights the largely understudied behavior of gliding locomotion, which is exhibited by a diverse range of animals spanning vertebrates and invertebrates, in air and in water. The insights in the literature gained from January 2022 to December 2022 continue to challenge the previously held notion of gliding as a relatively simple form of locomotion. Using advances in field/lab data collection and computation, the highlighted studies cover gliding in animals including seabirds, flying lizards, flying snakes, geckos, dragonflies, damselflies, and dolphins. Altogether, these studies present gliding as a sophisticated behavior resulting from the interdependent aspects of morphology, sensing, environment, and likely selective pressures. This review uses these insights as inspiration to encourage researchers to revisit gliding locomotion, both in the animal's natural habitat and in the laboratory, and to investigate questions spanning gliding biomechanics, ecology, sensing, and the evolution of animal flight.

Indexed as

LizardsOdonataAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFlight, AnimalLocomotionWings, AnimalAnimalsAquaticFlappingHypothesisNon-flapping

Identifiers

PMID37581305
PMCPMC10445725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.