Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37581181›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2023

UK ERCP sedation practices, patient comfort and endoscopist characteristics: National Endoscopy Database (NED) analysis on behalf of the JAG and BSG.

David Beaton, Matt Rutter, Linda Sharp, Kofi W Oppong, Bidour Awadelkarim, Simon M Everett, Vikramjit Mitra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David BeatonGastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4329-8842
Matt RutterGastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Linda SharpNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Kofi W OppongHepatobiliary Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Bidour AwadelkarimHepatobiliary Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Simon M EverettGastroenterology, St James's University Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4251-5323
Vikramjit MitraGastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust · GBFreeman Hospital · GBNewcastle University · GBSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This analysis assessed current endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) practice within the UK, including use of sedation and patient comfort. Methods: ERCPs conducted over 1 year (1 July 2021-30 June 2022) and uploaded to the National Endoscopy Database (NED) were analysed. The endoscopist workforce was classified by gender and specialty, use of sedation was analysed. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between patient age, gender and procedure indications on moderate to severe discomfort risk. Results: 27 812 ERCPs were performed by 491 endoscopists in 175 sites and uploaded to NED, an estimated 50% of total UK activity. 13% were training procedures, 94% of the endoscopists were male, with 72% being gastroenterologists. Most ERCPs were performed under conscious sedation (89%). The discomfort rate among patients aged 60-90 undergoing ERCP under conscious sedation was 4.2% (95% CI 3.9% to 4.5%), with only 5.5% (95% CI 5.2% to 5.9%) receiving greater than 5 mg midazolam or 100 µg fentanyl.Younger patients (<30 years) had a higher discomfort risk during conscious sedation ERCPs than those aged 70-79 (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.2 to 4.3, p<0.05), while male patients had a lower discomfort risk compared with females (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.0, p=0.05).Enhanced sedation (propofol or general anaesthetic) was associated with lower frequency of discomfort (0.3%, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.6) compared with conscious sedation (5.1%, 95% CI 4.9% to 5.4%, p<0.05). Conclusions: Conscious sedation is well tolerated for most patients and prescribing practices have improved. However, triage of more patients, particularly young females, to enhanced sedation lists should be considered to reduce discomfort rates in future.

Indexed as

CLINICAL DECISION MAKINGDIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPYENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURESENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE PANCREATOGRAPHYTOLERANCE

Identifiers

PMID37581181
PMCPMC10423606
OpenAlexW4368374078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.