ArticleCureus2023
Development and Validation of the Cognitive Behavior Questionnaire in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain (CBQ-NSCLBP).
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background It's common to experience chronic low back pain (CLBP), having serious psychological as well as physical implications. The experience of CLBP and its management depends greatly on cognitive and behavioral aspects. However, there is a requirement for a valid and reliable instrument that assesses the characteristics associated with this condition. Purpose The Cognitive Behavior Questionnaire in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain (CBQ-NSCLBP), a questionnaire for measuring cognitive behavior was created and validated for this study. Methodology To validate the instrument, the consensus technique with two rounds of the modified Delphi process was used. With a varied background, 13 experts in the field were specifically chosen. Utilizing the literature review, an outline of the questionnaire was created. Each of the suggested things was evaluated by the experts using a five-point Likert scale. The items completed the descriptive analysis using the criteria for validation and elimination. Results The research findings showed that the CBQ-NSCLBP had good psychometric characteristics. The content Validity Ratio (CVR) (Critical) for a panel size (N) of 13 is 0.54 & for CBQ-NSCLBP is 0.70, which was regarded as indicative of strong content validity. Test-retest reliability showed that intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values for all the items were greater than 0.9 which indicates excellent reliability. Spearman's correlation test between CBQ-NSCLBP and the Survey of Pain Questionnaire-Brief (SOPA-B) has shown that all the items are valid since the correlation value is higher than the cutoff value (0.139). Exploratory Factor Analysis was performed and three factors were retained based on eigenvalue greater than one. Conclusion In order to evaluate cognitive behavior in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain (NSCLBP), we created this tool. This will make it easy to understand the level of cognition in NSCLBP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.