ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Context-aware augmentation for liver lesion segmentation: shape uniformity, expansion limit and fusion strategy.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of potential targets for antidepressant Chinese medicines: AI and multi-omics methods.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Automatic computed tomography image segmentation method for liver tumor based on a modified tokenized multilayer perceptron and attention mechanism.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Systematic Review: AI Applications in Liver Imaging with a Focus on Segmentation and Detection.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Data augmentation with context has been an effective way to increase the robustness and generalizability of deep learning models. However, to our knowledge, shape uniformity, expansion limit, and fusion strategy of context have yet to be comprehensively studied, particularly in lesion segmentation of medical images. Methods: To examine the impact of these factors, we take liver lesion segmentation based on the well-known deep learning architecture U-Net as an example and thoroughly vary the context shape, the expansion bandwidth as well as three representative fusion methods. In particular, the context shape includes rectangular, circular and polygonal, the expansion bandwidth is scaled by a maximum value of 2 compared to the lesion size, and the context fusion weighting strategy is composed of average, Gaussian and inverse Gaussian. Results: Studies conducted on a newly constructed high-quality and large-volume dataset show that (I) uniform context improves lesion segmentation, (II) expanding the context with either 5 or 7 pixels yields the highest performance for liver lesion segmentation, depending on the lesion size, and (III) an unevenly distributed weighting strategy for context fusion is appreciated but in the opposite direction, depending on lesion size as well. Conclusions: Our findings and newly constructed dataset are expected to be useful for liver lesion segmentation, especially for small lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.