Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37581073›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Deep learning radiomics for prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stage T1-2 breast cancer.

Wei Wei, Qiang Ma, Huijun Feng, Tianjun Wei, Feng Jiang, Lifang Fan, Wei Zhang, Jingya Xu, Xia Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei WeiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, China.
Qiang MaDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, China.
Huijun FengDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, China.
Tianjun WeiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, China.
Feng JiangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, China.
Lifang FanSchool of Medical Imaging, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, China.
Jingya XuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, China.
Xia ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College · CNWannan Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study investigates whether deep learning radiomics of conventional ultrasound images can predict preoperative axillary lymph node (ALN) status in patients with clinical stages T1-2 breast cancer (BC). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the preoperative ultrasound data of 892 patients with BC, who were classified into training (n=535), validation (n=178), and test (n=179) cohorts. Linear combinations of the selected features were weighted by their coefficients to obtain the predicted score. Then, deep learning radiomic features were extracted from the ultrasound images to evaluate the ALN status. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were drawn, followed by the calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) to assess the accuracy of the prediction model in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in the three cohorts. Results: Deep learning radiomics combined with radiomics and clinical parameters was the optimal diagnostic predictor of the ALN status in the absence and presence of ALNM, with the AUC of 0.920 (95% confidence interval: 0.872 and 0.968, respectively). Additionally, this combination could also differentiate low-load ALNM [N + (1-2)] from heavy-load ALNM with ≥3 positive nodes [N + (≥3)] in the test cohort, with the AUC of 0.819 (95% confidence interval: 0.568 and 1.00, respectively). Conclusions: Conclusively, deep learning radiomics of ultrasound images is a non-invasive approach to predicting preoperative ALNM in BC.

Indexed as

axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM)breast cancer (BC)clinical parametersDeep learning radiomicsradiomics

Identifiers

PMID37581073
PMCPMC10423344
OpenAlexW4385525643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.