ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Dynamic controllable residual generative adversarial network for low-dose computed tomography imaging.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The application of deep learning-based artificial intelligence algorithms combined with low-dose scanning protocols in chest CT.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Sliding volume-based streak artifact reduction network (S-STAR Net) for ultra-sparse-view computed tomography.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computed tomography (CT) imaging technology has become an indispensable auxiliary method in medical diagnosis and treatment. In mitigating the radiation damage caused by X-rays, low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scanning is becoming more widely applied. However, LDCT scanning reduces the signal-to-noise ratio of the projection, and the resulting images suffer from serious streak artifacts and spot noise. In particular, the intensity of noise and artifacts varies significantly across different body parts under a single low-dose protocol. Methods: To improve the quality of different degraded LDCT images in a unified framework, we developed a generative adversarial learning framework with a dynamic controllable residual. First, the generator network consists of the basic subnetwork and the conditional subnetwork. Inspired by the dynamic control strategy, we designed the basic subnetwork to adopt a residual architecture, with the conditional subnetwork providing weights to control the residual intensity. Second, we chose the Visual Geometry Group Network-128 (VGG-128) as the discriminator to improve the noise artifact suppression and feature retention ability of the generator. Additionally, a hybrid loss function was specifically designed, including the mean square error (MSE) loss, structural similarity index metric (SSIM) loss, adversarial loss, and gradient penalty (GP) loss. Results: The results obtained on two datasets show the competitive performance of the proposed framework, with a 3.22 dB peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) margin, 0.03 SSIM margin, and 0.2 contrast-to-noise ratio margin on the Challenge data and a 1.0 dB PSNR margin and 0.01 SSIM margin on the real data. Conclusions: Experimental results demonstrated the competitive performance of the proposed method in terms of noise decrease, structural retention, and visual impression improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.