ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Modality preserving U-Net for segmentation of multimodal medical images.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glioma Segmentation on Multicenter 2D-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Low-Rank Adaptation Tuning of a Foundation Model: An External Test Evaluation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Application and prospect of artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging of prostate cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Dilated multi-scale residual attention (DMRA) U-Net: three-dimensional (3D) dilated multi-scale residual attention U-Net for brain tumor segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Integrating a deep neural network and Transformer architecture for the automatic segmentation and survival prediction in cervical cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Enhancing automatic prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer with deep transfer learning 2.5-dimensional segmentation on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI).Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a fully automatic tissue delineation model for brain metastasis using a deep neural network.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recent advances in artificial intelligence and digital image processing have inspired the use of deep neural networks for segmentation tasks in multimodal medical imaging. Unlike natural images, multimodal medical images contain much richer information regarding different modal properties and therefore present more challenges for semantic segmentation. However, there is no report on systematic research that integrates multi-scaled and structured analysis of single-modal and multimodal medical images. Methods: We propose a deep neural network, named as Modality Preserving U-Net (MPU-Net), for modality-preserving analysis and segmentation of medical targets from multimodal medical images. The proposed MPU-Net consists of a modality preservation encoder (MPE) module that preserves the feature independency among the modalities and a modality fusion decoder (MFD) module that performs a multiscale feature fusion analysis for each modality in order to provide a rich feature representation for the final task. The effectiveness of such a single-modal preservation and multimodal fusion feature extraction approach is verified by multimodal segmentation experiments and an ablation study using brain tumor and prostate datasets from Medical Segmentation Decathlon (MSD). Results: The segmentation experiments demonstrated the superiority of MPU-Net over other methods in the segmentation tasks for multimodal medical images. In the brain tumor segmentation tasks, the Dice scores (DSCs) for the whole tumor (WT), the tumor core (TC) and the enhancing tumor (ET) regions were 89.42%, 86.92%, and 84.59%, respectively. In the meanwhile, the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) results were 3.530, 4.899 and 2.555, respectively. In the prostate segmentation tasks, the DSCs for the peripheral zone (PZ) and the transitional zone (TZ) of the prostate were 71.20% and 90.38%, respectively. In the meanwhile, the 95% HD95 results were 6.367 and 4.766, respectively. The ablation study showed that the combination of single-modal preservation and multimodal fusion methods improved the performance of multimodal medical image feature analysis. Conclusions: In the segmentation tasks using brain tumor and prostate datasets, the MPU-Net method has achieved the improved performance in comparison with the conventional methods, indicating its potential application for other segmentation tasks in multimodal medical images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.