Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37581036›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Deep Q-learning to globally optimize a

Hongmei Zhang, Songshi Liang, Luke A Matkovic, Shadab Momin, Kai Wang, Xiaofeng Yang, Michael F Insana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongmei ZhangKey Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Songshi LiangFaculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Luke A MatkovicDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shadab MominDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kai WangBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Xiaofeng YangFaculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Michael F InsanaBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Estimation of the global optima of multiple model parameters is valuable for precisely extracting parameters that characterize a physical environment. This is especially useful for imaging purposes, to form reliable, meaningful physical images with good reproducibility. However, it is challenging to avoid different local minima when the objective function is nonconvex. The problem of global searching of multiple parameters was formulated to be a Methods: We proposed a novel Deep Q-learning of Model Parameters (DQMP) method for global optimization which updated the parameter configurations through actions that maximized the Q-value and employed a Deep Reward Network (DRN) designed to learn global reward values from both visible fitting errors and hidden parameter errors. The DRN was constructed with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) layers followed by fully connected layers and a rectified linear unit (ReLU) nonlinearity. The depth of the DRN depended on the number of parameters. Through DQMP, the Results: The DQMP method was evaluated by widely used general functions that can express a variety of experimental data and further validated on imaging applications. The convergence of the proposed DRN was evaluated, which showed that the loss values of six general functions all converged after 12 epochs. The parameters estimated by the DQMP method had relative errors of less than 4% for all cases, whereas the relative errors achieved by Q-learning (QL) and the Least Squares Method (LSM) were 17% and 21%, respectively. Furthermore, the imaging experiments demonstrated that the imaging of the parameters estimated by the proposed DQMP method were the closest to the ground truth simulation images when compared to other methods. Conclusions: The proposed DQMP method was able to achieve global optima, thus yielding accurate model parameter estimates. DQMP is promising for estimating multiple high-dimensional parameters and can be generalized to global optimization for many other complex nonconvex functions and imaging of physical parameters.

Indexed as

Deep Q-learning (QL)global optimak-D board movemultiple parameters optimizationnonconvex function

Identifiers

PMID37581036
PMCPMC10423342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.