ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2023
Cemiplimab for the Treatment of Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Appropriate Patient Selection and Perspectives.
Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab Treatment for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of sequential ¹⁷⁷Lu/²²⁵Ac-LNC1004 FAP-targeted radionuclide therapy combined with anti-PD-L1 blockade in pancreatic cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Successful remission of advanced basosquamous cell carcinoma with cemiplimab monotherapy.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- Second-line treatments for patients with programmed cell death protein 1-refractory cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas: a brief report.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Article
- A Treatment Decision Model for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Bayesian Networks.Cancers · 2026Article
- Perioperative Systemic Therapy for High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Review
- PD-1H (VISTA) Expression in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Is Correlated with T-Cell Infiltration and Activation.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2025Article
- [Complex therapy for non-melanotic skin cancers in the head and neck region].Magyar onkologia · 2025Review
- From actinic keratosis to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: the key pathogenesis and treatments.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- A Novel Intersection: Cytomegalovirus Gastritis Following Cemiplimab and Talimogene Laherparepvec in a Patient With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Exploring Costimulatory Blockade-Based Immunologic Strategies in Transplantation: Are They a Promising Immunomodulatory Approach for Organ and Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation?Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- PD-1 and PD-L1: architects of immune symphony and immunotherapy breakthroughs in cancer treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Five percent of patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma develop locally advanced or metastatic disease that is not amenable to definitive surgical or radiation therapy. Cemiplimab, an antibody against programmed death receptor-1, was approved in the United States for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in 2018. We performed a literature review on the use of cemiplimab in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, with an emphasis on efficacy, safety and tolerability, patient selection, and future directions. Embase and PubMed were searched for relevant terms, and 23 peer-reviewed journal articles presenting primary data on cemiplimab treatment in 5 or more subjects with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma were included and summarized. Objective response rates in locally advanced and metastatic disease ranged from 42.9% to 50.8% in Phase I/II clinical trials and 32-77% (median 58%) in post-approval observational studies. Phase II trials looking at neoadjuvant use also had favorable response rates. Real-world studies demonstrated cemiplimab efficacy in periorbital tumors, tumors with large caliber perineural invasion, and tumors in solid organ transplant recipients. Cemiplimab was safe and well-tolerated in most patients. While side effects such as fatigue, diarrhea, pruritus, and rash were fairly common, only 9.8% of adverse events required cessation of therapy in phase II trials. Severe adverse events were primarily immune-mediated, including pneumonitis, myocarditis, myositis, and autoimmune hepatitis; the risk of treatment-related death was 3% in clinical trials. Further research on cemiplimab therapy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is needed, and trials are now underway to obtain Phase IV long-term real-world data, further data on adjuvant and neoadjuvant use, and additional data in special populations such as stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.