Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37581012›Full record

ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2023

Cemiplimab for the Treatment of Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Appropriate Patient Selection and Perspectives.

Layna Mager, Samantha Gardeen, David R Carr, Kathryn T Shahwan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Layna Mager *College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Samantha Gardeen *Division of Dermatology, HealthPartners, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
David R CarrDepartment of Dermatology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kathryn T ShahwanDepartment of Dermatology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
The Ohio State University · USHealthPartners · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five percent of patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma develop locally advanced or metastatic disease that is not amenable to definitive surgical or radiation therapy. Cemiplimab, an antibody against programmed death receptor-1, was approved in the United States for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in 2018. We performed a literature review on the use of cemiplimab in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, with an emphasis on efficacy, safety and tolerability, patient selection, and future directions. Embase and PubMed were searched for relevant terms, and 23 peer-reviewed journal articles presenting primary data on cemiplimab treatment in 5 or more subjects with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma were included and summarized. Objective response rates in locally advanced and metastatic disease ranged from 42.9% to 50.8% in Phase I/II clinical trials and 32-77% (median 58%) in post-approval observational studies. Phase II trials looking at neoadjuvant use also had favorable response rates. Real-world studies demonstrated cemiplimab efficacy in periorbital tumors, tumors with large caliber perineural invasion, and tumors in solid organ transplant recipients. Cemiplimab was safe and well-tolerated in most patients. While side effects such as fatigue, diarrhea, pruritus, and rash were fairly common, only 9.8% of adverse events required cessation of therapy in phase II trials. Severe adverse events were primarily immune-mediated, including pneumonitis, myocarditis, myositis, and autoimmune hepatitis; the risk of treatment-related death was 3% in clinical trials. Further research on cemiplimab therapy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is needed, and trials are now underway to obtain Phase IV long-term real-world data, further data on adjuvant and neoadjuvant use, and additional data in special populations such as stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients.

Indexed as

cemiplimabcutaneous squamous cell carcinomaimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmunotherapyprogrammed death receptor-1 inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID37581012
PMCPMC10423569
OpenAlexW4385703518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.