Trial reportCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023
Interpretability of radiomics models is improved when using feature group selection strategies for predicting molecular and clinical targets in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: insights from the TRACERx Renal study.
Trial report in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03226886 (TRACERx Renal), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
TRACERx Renal (TRAcking Renal Cell Carcinoma Evolution Through Therapy (Rx)) CAPTURE: COVID-19 Antiviral Response in a Pan-tumour Immune Study
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- CT-Based Radiomics for Prediction of Molecular Markers in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Explainable AI in Cancer Imaging: Scoping Review of Methods, Modalities, and Clinical Integration.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Fréchet radiomic distance (FRD): A versatile metric for comparing medical imaging datasets.Medical image analysis · 2026Article
- Enhancing cancer prognostics with group penalty models: a comparative study on radiomics feature selection in lung adenocarcinomas and meningiomas.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of artificial intelligence models in radiology: a systemic scoping review of diagnostic and endovascular applications.CVIR endovascular · 2025Review
- Enhanced staging of renal cell carcinoma using tumor morphology features: model development and multi-source validation.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Radiomics Beyond the Hype: A Critical Evaluation Toward Oncologic Clinical Use.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Emerging Trends in AI and Radiomics for Bladder, Kidney, and Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Scientific Status Quo of Small Renal Lesions: Diagnostic Assessment and Radiomics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Mathematical and Machine Learning Models of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A CT-based radiomics classification model for the prediction of histological type and tumour grade in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RADSARC-R): a retrospective multicohort analysis.The Lancet. Oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this work is to evaluate the performance of radiomics predictions for a range of molecular, genomic and clinical targets in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and demonstrate the impact of novel feature selection strategies and sub-segmentations on model interpretability.
methodsContrast-enhanced CT scans from the first 101 patients recruited to the TRACERx Renal Cancer study (NCT03226886) were used to derive radiomics classification models to predict 20 molecular, histopathology and clinical target variables. Manual 3D segmentation was used in conjunction with automatic sub-segmentation to generate radiomics features from the core, rim, high and low enhancing sub-regions, and the whole tumour. Comparisons were made between two classification model pipelines: a Conventional pipeline reflecting common radiomics practice, and a Proposed pipeline including two novel feature selection steps designed to improve model interpretability. For both pipelines nested cross-validation was used to estimate prediction performance and tune model hyper-parameters, and permutation testing was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the estimated performance measures. Further model robustness assessments were conducted by evaluating model variability across the cross-validation folds.
resultsClassification performance was significant (p < 0.05, H
conclusionsUse of the Proposed pipeline, which includes the novel feature selection methods, leads to more interpretable models without compromising prediction performance.
trial registrationNCT03226886 (TRACERx Renal).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.