ReviewClinical hypertension2023
Short-term blood pressure variability as a potential therapeutic target for kidney disease.
Review in Clinical hypertension, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertensive Patients: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Trial
- Sex differences in blood pressure variability during critical illness: a retrospective cohort study.Open heart · 2026Article
- Perirenal Fat Thickness Is Associated With Disturbed Circadian Blood Pressure Rhythm in Essential Hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Short-term blood pressure variability assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring as a predictor of subclinical target organ damage.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Frailty transitions and risk of chronic kidney disease: insights from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Relationship Between Subclinical Renal Damage and Maximum Rate of Blood Pressure Variation Assessed by Fourier Analysis of 24-h Blood Pressure Curve in Patients with Essential Hypertension.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The relationship between homocysteine levels and blood pressure variability with early renal injury marker NGAL in patients with H-type hypertension.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Association between intraoperative blood pressure variability and postoperative complications: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Association Between Blood Pressure Variation During Dialysis and Cardio-Cerebrovascular Events.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Blood Pressure Rhythmicity for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Male Hypertensive Patients Aged 55 and Older.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-term blood pressure variability (BPV) measured with ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring has been demonstrated to be significant in predicting various clinical outcomes. Short-term BPV is distinguished from long-term BPV based on the time interval in which BP fluctuations are measured. Increased short-term BPV has been linked to detrimental effects on the microvascular structure and contributes to subclinical organ damage in the heart, blood vessels, and kidneys, regardless of the average 24-h BP levels. Short-term BPV can be defined by various measures, including calculated metrics (standard deviation, coefficient of variation, average real variability, weighted standard deviation, variability independent of the mean) or dipping patterns. Nevertheless, the additional role of short-term BPV beyond the predictive value of average 24-h BPs or established risk factors for cardiovascular disease and kidney disease remains unclear. In particular, longitudinal studies that evaluate the association between short-term BPV and kidney function impairment are limited and no conclusive data exist regarding which short-term BPV indicators most accurately reflect the prognosis of kidney disease. The issue of how to treat BPV in clinical practice is another concern that is frequently raised. This paper presents a review of the evidence for the prognostic role of short-term BPV in kidney outcomes. Additionally, this review discusses the remaining concerns about short-term BPV that need to be further investigated as an independent risk modifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.