Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580833›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2023

Oral and nasal provocation test in chicken egg allergy-case report.

E Krzych-Fałta, O Wojas, P Samel-Kowalik, B Samoliński, A Sybilski, S Białek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E Krzych-FałtaDepartment of Basic of Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9857-7136
O WojasDepartment of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Str, 02097, Warsaw, Poland. oksana.wojas@wum.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1653-9388
P Samel-KowalikDepartment of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Str, 02097, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9047-0414
B SamolińskiDepartment of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Str, 02097, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4043-7747
A SybilskiSecond Department of Pediatrics, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-277X
S BiałekDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacogenomics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6733-000X
Medical University of Warsaw · PLPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAllergy to chicken egg protein is a common form of food allergy. The most common clinical presentation includes gastrointestinal, skin, and respiratory symptoms. Differential diagnosis, including provocative tests, is critical in diagnosis. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a case of a 21-year-old patient with egg allergy, who underwent a double-blind food provocation test with placebo (evaluating subjective complaints from the gastrointestinal tract) and a titrated nasal provocation test using dry chicken egg content. We assessed the response of the nasal mucosa in the provocation test using the visual analogue scale (VAS), acoustic and optical rhinometry, as well as measurements of nitric oxide concentration in the exhaled air. During the provocation test, we measured the changes in the transverse section of the nasal passages, which were accompanied by subjective complaints measured with the VAS scale, using objective techniques. In the nasal provocation test with a dose of 20 µg of chicken egg protein, we observed an increase in the reactivity of the nasal mucosa and a decrease in the level of nitric oxide in the exhaled air from the upper airways (920 ppb before the provocation test and up to 867 ppb during the early stage of the allergic reaction). During the provocation tests, we recorded typical symptoms associated with the early stage of the allergic reaction; including nasal obstruction (1.2 cm), leakage of watery discharge (0.8 cm) in the food test, and itchy nose (1.1 cm) in the food test vs. the nasal test: 4.6, 2.8, and 3.5 cm, respectively.

conclusionsThe nasal mucosa provides convenient conditions for evaluation of the severity of allergy to common food allergens, including chicken egg allergens.

Indexed as

Egg allergyFood allergyNasal mucosa reactivityNasal provocation testPlacebo-controlled food challenge

Identifiers

PMID37580833
PMCPMC10426171
OpenAlexW4385811113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.