Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580815›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2023

Using audit and feedback to guide tailored implementations of measurement-based care in community mental health: a multiple case study.

Mira D H Snider, Meredith R Boyd, Madison R Walker, Byron J Powell, Cara C Lewis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02266134 (Standardized Versus Tailored Implementation of Measurement Based Care for Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02266134 nacompletednot on this map

Standardized Versus Tailored Implementation of Measurement Based Care for Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2015 to 2019Enrolled382ConditionsDepressionArmsTailored Implementation of Measurement Based Care, Standard Implementation of Measurement Based Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. COPD CARE Academy: Design of Purposeful Training Guided by Implementation Strategies.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mira D H SniderDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, 53 Campus Drive Morgantown, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA. mdh0054@mix.wvu.edu.
Meredith R BoydDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Madison R WalkerCenter for Health Equity Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Byron J PowellCenter for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
Cara C LewisKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, USA.

Funding

Standardized versus Tailored Implementation of Measurement Based Care for DepressionR01MH103310 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, CARA CHARISSA · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH-103310NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAudit and feedback (A&F) is an implementation strategy that can facilitate implementation tailoring by identifying gaps between desired and actual clinical care. While there are several theory-based propositions on which A&F components lead to better implementation outcomes, many have not been empirically investigated, and there is limited guidance for stakeholders when applying A&F in practice. The current study aims to illustrate A&F procedures in six community mental health clinics, with an emphasis on reporting A&F components that are relevant to theories of how feedback elicits behavior change.

methodsSix clinics from a larger trial using a tailored approach to implement measurement-based care (MBC) were analyzed for feedback content, delivery mechanisms, barriers to feedback, and outcomes of feedback using archival data. Pattern analysis was conducted to examine relations between A&F components and changes in MBC use.

resultsSeveral sites utilized both aggregate and individualized data summaries, and data accuracy concerns were common. Feedback cycles featuring individual-level clinician data, data relevant to MBC barriers, and information requested by data recipients were related to patterns of increased MBC use.

conclusionsThese findings support extant theory, such as Feedback Intervention Theory. Mental health professionals wishing to apply A&F should consider establishing reciprocal feedback mechanisms on the quality and amount of data being received and adopting specific roles communicating and addressing data quality concerns.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02266134.

Indexed as

Audit and feedbackCase studyMeasurement-based carePattern analysisTailored implementation

Identifiers

PMID37580815
PMCPMC10424451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.