Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580670›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2023

Selective COX-2 inhibitors do not increase gastrointestinal reactions after colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ting Hu, Cheng-Jiang Liu, Xiaoming Yin, WenJuan Tang, LanFang Yin, Hui Bai, FangFang Liu, Dan Wang, YiLei Li

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Celecoxib in oncology: targeting the COX-2/PGEFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ting Hu *Department of General Practice, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, AnHui, China.
Cheng-Jiang Liu *Department of General Medicine, Affiliated Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anqing, 246000, AnHui, China.
Xiaoming YinDepartment of General Practice, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, AnHui, China. yinxm75@163.com.
WenJuan TangDepartment of General Practice, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, AnHui, China.
LanFang YinDepartment of General Practice, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, AnHui, China.
Hui BaiDepartment of General Practice, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, AnHui, China.
FangFang LiuDepartment of General Practice, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, AnHui, China.
Dan WangDepartment of General Practice, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, AnHui, China.
YiLei LiDepartment of General Practice, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, AnHui, China.
Anqing City Hospital · CNAnhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of selective COX-2 inhibitors in preventing colorectal cancer recurrence has been demonstrated, however it is unknown how safe and successful they will be over the long term. As a result, we looked at the efficacy, safety, and consequences of adding COX-2 inhibitors to the treatment plan afterward.

methodsIn patients with advanced colorectal cancer, we compared the efficacy of celecoxib at two different doses (200 mg twice day and 400 mg twice daily) with placebo. To evaluate the impacts of post-treatment, several datasets from inception to June 2022 were searched. Response rate, illness control rate, and 3-year survival were the main results. And evaluated several safety outcomes, particularly those that were susceptible to adverse events.

resultsThe study comprised a total of 9 randomized controlled trials (3206 participants). Celecoxib and rofecoxib doidn't significantly improved the 1-3 year remission rate (OR, 1.57 [95% CI: 0.95-2.57]) and disease control rate (OR, 1.08 [95% CI: 0.99-1.17]). Subgroup analysis of different doses showed that 400 mg of celecoxib significantly improved the response rate (OR, 2.82 [95%CI: 1.20-6.61]). 200 mg celecoxib was not significant (OR, 1.28 [95% CI: 0.66-2.49]). Rofecoxib also did not fully improve disease response rates. Celecoxib at any dose improved 3-year survival (OR, 1.21 [95% CI: 1.02-1.45]). It is important to note that COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly enhance the likelihood of adverse events including gastrointestinal or cardiovascular side effects at any dose.

conclusionsFor patients with advanced colorectal cancer, a reasonable chemoprevention regimen can include celecoxib 400 mg twice daily.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCelecoxibHumansLactonesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSulfonesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCelecoxibCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsLactonesrofecoxibSulfonesCelecoxibChemopreventionColorectal cancerCOX-2 inhibitormeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID37580670
PMCPMC10426080
OpenAlexW4385810571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.