Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580637›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

Understanding Patients' Preferences and Experiences During an Electronic Health Record Transition.

Gemmae M Fix, Trenton M Haltom, Alison M Cogan, Stephanie L Shimada, Jessica A Davila

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gemmae M FixCenter for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, 200 Springs Rd., Bedford, MA, USA. gemmae.fix@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6055-4177
Trenton M HaltomCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2450 Holcombe Blvd Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Alison M CoganCenter for the Study of Health Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stephanie L ShimadaCenter for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, 200 Springs Rd., Bedford, MA, USA.
Jessica A DavilaCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2450 Holcombe Blvd Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Boston University · USMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs SDR 20-197-A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has embarked on the largest system-wide electronic health record (EHR) transition in history. To date, most research on EHR-to-EHR transitions has focused on employee and system transition-related needs, with limited focus on how patients experience transitions.

objective(1) Understand patients' preferences for information and support prior to an EHR transition, and (2) examine actual patient experiences that occurred at facilities that implemented a new EHR.

designWe used a two-step approach. We had discussions with geographically diverse patient advisory groups. Discussions informed semi-structured, qualitative interviews with patients.

participantsPatients affected by the EHR transition. MAIN MEASURES: We met with four patient advisory groups at sites that had not transitioned their EHR. Interviews were conducted with patients who received care at one of two facilities that recently transitioned to the new EHR. KEY

resultsPatient advisors identified key areas important to patients during an EHR transition. 1) Use a range of communication strategies to reach diverse populations, especially older, rural patients. 2) Information about the EHR transition should be clear and reinforce trustworthiness. 3) Patients will need guidance using the new patient portal. From the patient interviews, we learned if and how these key areas mapped onto patients' experiences. Patients at the sites that had transitioned learned about the new EHR through a variety of modalities, including letters and banners on the patient portal. However, their experiences varied in terms of information quality, leading to frustrations during and between healthcare encounters. Patient portal issues exacerbated frustrations. These raised concerns about the accuracy and security of the overall EHR.

conclusionsMaintaining clear communication across patients, local leadership, and providers throughout an EHR transition is essential for successful implementation. Patient-facing communications can set expectations, and help patients receive adequate support, particularly related to the patient portal.

Indexed as

electronic health recordpatient engagementpatient experiencepatient portalqualitative

Identifiers

PMID37580637
OpenAlexW4385803189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.