Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37580615›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

Differences in the position of endometriosis-associated and non-associated ovarian cancer relative to the uterus.

Tsukasa Saida, Kensaku Mori, Toshitaka Ishiguro, Yukihisa Saida, Toyomi Satoh, Takahito Nakajima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tsukasa SaidaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan. saida_sasaki_tsukasa@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4530-7375
Kensaku MoriDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
Toshitaka IshiguroDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
Yukihisa SaidaDepartment of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
Toyomi SatohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
Takahito NakajimaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JPSt. Luke's International Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative assessment of the histological type of ovarian cancer is essential to determine the appropriate treatment strategy. Tumor location may be helpful in this regard. The purpose of this study was to compare the position of endometriosis-associated (EAOCs) and non-associated (non-EAOCs) ovarian cancer relative to the uterus using MRI.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients with pathologically confirmed malignant epithelial ovarian tumors who underwent MRI at our hospital between January 2015 and January 2023. T2-weighted images of the sagittal and axial sections of the long axis of the uterine body were used for the analysis. Three blinded experienced radiologists independently interpreted the images and assessed whether the ovarian tumor was attached to the uterus, and the angle between the uterus and the tumor was measured. The presence of attachment and the measured angles were compared for each histology. In addition, the angles between EAOCs, including endometrioid carcinomas (ECs) and clear cell carcinomas (CCCs), were compared with non-EAOCs.

resultsIn total, 184 women (mean age, 56 years; age range, 20-91 years) were evaluated. High-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) were significantly smaller than the others and had significantly less uterine attachment than CCCs (p < 0.01 for all readers). According to the mean of the measured angles, CCCs were positioned significantly more posteriorly than HGSCs and mucinous carcinomas (p < 0.02), and EAOCs were positioned significantly more posteriorly to the uterus than non-EAOCs (p < 0.01).

conclusionHGSCs are often not attached to the uterus, and EAOCs are positioned more posteriorly to the uterus than non-EAOCs. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: High-grade serous carcinomas were often not attached to the uterus, and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers were positioned more posteriorly to the uterus than non-endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers. KEY POINTS: • The position of the ovarian tumor can be determined using MRI. • High-grade serous carcinomas had less attachment to the uterus. • Endometriosis-associated cancers were positioned more posteriorly to the uterus. • The location of ovarian tumors is helpful in estimating histology.

Indexed as

CarcinomaLocationMagnetic resonance imagingOvary

Identifiers

PMID37580615
PMCPMC10425308
OpenAlexW4385797573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.