ArticleExperimental brain research2023
Implicit reward-based motor learning.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful reinforcement history suppresses explicit and implicit error corrections.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Hypothesis testing governs strategic motor learning.NPJ science of learning · 2026Article
- Enforcing a high success percentage interferes with reward-based motor learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Motor learning mechanisms are not modified by feedback manipulations in a real-world task.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Article
- Indirect feedback hinders explicit sensorimotor adaptation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- The sign of exploration during reward-based motor learning is not independent from trial to trial.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of Declarative Learning on the Consolidation of Acquired Motor Skills Under Valence Feedback.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Distinct patterns of connectivity with the motor cortex reflect different components of sensorimotor learning.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- A Circle-Drawing Task for Studying Reward-Based Motor Learning in Children and Adults.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Motor adaptation is reduced by symbolic compared to sensory feedback.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Binary feedback, providing information solely about task success or failure, can be sufficient to drive motor learning. While binary feedback can induce explicit adjustments in movement strategy, it remains unclear if this type of feedback also induces implicit learning. We examined this question in a center-out reaching task by gradually moving an invisible reward zone away from a visual target to a final rotation of 7.5° or 25° in a between-group design. Participants received binary feedback, indicating if the movement intersected the reward zone. By the end of the training, both groups modified their reach angle by about 95% of the rotation. We quantified implicit learning by measuring performance in a subsequent no-feedback aftereffect phase, in which participants were told to forgo any adopted movement strategies and reach directly to the visual target. The results showed a small, but robust (2-3°) aftereffect in both groups, highlighting that binary feedback elicits implicit learning. Notably, for both groups, reaches to two flanking generalization targets were biased in the same direction as the aftereffect. This pattern is at odds with the hypothesis that implicit learning is a form of use-dependent learning. Rather, the results suggest that binary feedback can be sufficient to recalibrate a sensorimotor map.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.